Suppr超能文献

血清癌胚抗原和CA 15 - 3在监测接受全身治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者中的意义:一项大规模回顾性研究

Significance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15-3 in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: a large-scale retrospective study.

作者信息

Kurebayashi Junichi, Yamamoto Yutaka, Tanaka Katsuhiro, Kohno Norio, Kurosumi Masafumi, Moriya Takuya, Nishimura Reiki, Ogawa Yoshinari, Taguchi Tetsuya

机构信息

Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2003;10(1):38-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02967624.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The significance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 15-3 in monitoring advanced breast cancer is still controversial. To clarify this issue, the Tumor Marker Study Group of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society conducted a large-scaled retrospective study.

METHODS

The findings from four clinical trials and seven institutes of 528 patients with advanced breast cancer were collected. Three-hundred forty-eight patients, in whom both serum CEA and CA 15-3 were measured during therapy, were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

The pretreatment positivity rate of CA 15-3 was significantly higher than that of CEA (p<0.0001). Time-to-progression (TTP) in CEA- and CA 15-3-positive patients was significantly shorter than TTP in negative patients. The changes in either marker level correlated well with response to therapy in marker-positive patients but not in negative patients. TTP in the marker-positive patients with a greater than 20%-reduction in either marker level during therapy was significantly longer than that in positive patients without such a reduction (p<0.01 for CEA and CA 15-3).

CONCLUSION

CA 15-3 is more useful for monitoring advanced breast cancer than CEA and a greater than 20%-reduction in marker levels suggests longer TTP in pretreatment marker-positive patients.

摘要

目的

血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和CA 15 - 3在晚期乳腺癌监测中的意义仍存在争议。为阐明这一问题,日本乳腺癌学会肿瘤标志物研究组进行了一项大规模回顾性研究。

方法

收集了来自四项临床试验和七个机构的528例晚期乳腺癌患者的研究结果。选择了348例在治疗期间同时检测血清CEA和CA 15 - 3的患者进行分析。

结果

CA 15 - 3的治疗前阳性率显著高于CEA(p<0.0001)。CEA和CA 15 - 3阳性患者的疾病进展时间(TTP)显著短于阴性患者。在标志物阳性患者中,任一标志物水平的变化与治疗反应密切相关,但在阴性患者中则不然。治疗期间任一标志物水平降低超过20%的标志物阳性患者的TTP显著长于未出现这种降低的阳性患者(CEA和CA 15 - 3均为p<0.01)。

结论

对于晚期乳腺癌的监测,CA 15 - 3比CEA更有用,并且标志物水平降低超过20%表明治疗前标志物阳性患者的TTP更长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验