• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌对喹诺酮类药物耐药性的研究]

[Study of quinolones resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas areuginosa].

作者信息

Feng P, Yu R, Xia P, Lü X, Zhu S

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital, WCUMS, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2001 Dec;32(4):501-4.

PMID:12528531
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors of quinolone-resistance mediating in Escherichia coli(E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Pseudomonas areuginosa(P. areuginosa) and examine the characteristic changes and quinolones resistance of these bacteria after exposing them to quinolones, dye-materials, and ultraviolet respectively.

METHODS

The agar plate inoculating on surface and tube broth two-fold dilution methods were adopted.

RESULTS

Quinolone-resistance was mainly mediated by repeated exposure of the bacteria to low level concentration of quinolone. No quinolone-resistance was found after exposure of the bacteria to ultra-violet and dye materials such as Ethidium bromide and Acry-orange. Among the three kinds of bacteria, E. coli tended to have stable high level of quinolone- resistance(MICs > or = 256 mg/L). S. aureus acquired mediate level of quinolone-resistance(MICs < or = 32 mg/L). P. aeruginosa acquired a high but not stable level(MICs > or = 256 mg/L) of resistance. These bacteria were cultured in the concentration of 1/2 x MIC, 1 x MIC, 2 x MIC, 4 x MIC, 5 x MIC ciprofloxacin, and were compared with those cultured in the same concentration of sparfloxacin and cefotaxime. After being affected by ciprofloxacin, the E. coli underwent apparent morphologic changes, such as becoming wider(2-3 times), longer(10-30 times), thread-like, and fewer in number. These changes were consistent with the increase of quinolone concentrations. The morphologic changes in P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were not so obvious as those in E. coli. Sparfloxacin and cefotaxime mainly led to the decrease in the numbers of bacteria. When the concentration of Sparfloxacin and cefotaxime were 4 x MICs, the changes of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were less obvious.

CONCLUSION

The bacteria's quinolone-resistance is mainly induced by the quinolone itself. The quinolone-resistance is more likely occur in E. coli than in P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. After exposure of the bacteria to ciprofloxacin, E. coli might have most apparent morphologic changes and occurrence resistance.

摘要

目的

研究大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌中喹诺酮耐药的介导因素,并分别观察这些细菌在暴露于喹诺酮类、染料物质和紫外线后其特性变化及喹诺酮耐药情况。

方法

采用平板表面接种法和试管肉汤二倍稀释法。

结果

喹诺酮耐药主要是由细菌反复暴露于低水平浓度的喹诺酮介导的。细菌在暴露于紫外线及溴化乙锭、吖啶橙等染料物质后未发现喹诺酮耐药。在这三种细菌中,大肠杆菌倾向于具有稳定的高水平喹诺酮耐药(最低抑菌浓度[MIC]≥256mg/L)。金黄色葡萄球菌获得中等水平的喹诺酮耐药(MIC≤32mg/L)。铜绿假单胞菌获得高但不稳定水平(MIC≥256mg/L)的耐药。将这些细菌分别在1/2×MIC、1×MIC、2×MIC、4×MIC、5×MIC浓度的环丙沙星中培养,并与在相同浓度的司帕沙星和头孢噻肟中培养的细菌进行比较。受环丙沙星作用后,大肠杆菌出现明显的形态学变化,如变宽(2 - 3倍)、变长(10 - 30倍)、呈丝状且数量减少。这些变化与喹诺酮浓度的增加一致。铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的形态学变化不如大肠杆菌明显。司帕沙星和头孢噻肟主要导致细菌数量减少。当司帕沙星和头孢噻肟的浓度为4×MIC时,铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的变化较不明显。

结论

细菌的喹诺酮耐药主要由喹诺酮本身诱导。大肠杆菌比铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌更易发生喹诺酮耐药。细菌在暴露于环丙沙星后,大肠杆菌可能具有最明显的形态学变化及耐药发生。

相似文献

1
[Study of quinolones resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas areuginosa].[大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌对喹诺酮类药物耐药性的研究]
Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2001 Dec;32(4):501-4.
2
[Investigation of the effect of efflux pump inhibitors to MIC values of ciprofloxacin in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus].[外排泵抑制剂对铜绿假单胞菌、大肠埃希菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株中 ciprofloxacin 最低抑菌浓度值影响的研究]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008 Oct;42(4):553-61.
3
Comparative pharmacodynamics of the new fluoroquinolone ABT492 and ciprofloxacin with Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro dynamic model.新型氟喹诺酮类药物ABT492与环丙沙星在体外动态模型中对大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的比较药效学
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Aug;24(2):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.02.026.
4
[In vitro short-term bactericidal activity and accumulation of NM394, the active metabolite of prulifloxacin, for Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin].[普卢利沙星的活性代谢产物NM394对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的体外短期杀菌活性及蓄积作用:与环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和加替沙星的比较]
Jpn J Antibiot. 2002 Dec;55(6):791-9.
5
Phenotypic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus, selected Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa after single and multiple in vitro exposures to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and trovafloxacin.金黄色葡萄球菌、特定肠杆菌科细菌及铜绿假单胞菌在体外单次及多次暴露于环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星和曲伐沙星后的表型耐药性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Mar;45(3):883-92. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.3.883-892.2001.
6
In vitro studies with five quinolones: evidence for changes in relative potency as quinolone resistance rises.对五种喹诺酮类药物的体外研究:随着喹诺酮类耐药性上升,相对效力变化的证据。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Nov;35(11):2329-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.11.2329.
7
Quinolone accumulation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌对喹诺酮类药物的蓄积。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Jan;43(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.1.61.
8
Prediction of the antimicrobial effects of trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin on staphylococci using an in-vitro dynamic model.使用体外动态模型预测曲伐沙星和环丙沙星对葡萄球菌的抗菌效果。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):483-90. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.483.
9
Antimicrobial activity and accumulation of moxifloxacin in quinolone-susceptible bacteria.莫西沙星在喹诺酮敏感菌中的抗菌活性及蓄积情况。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 May;43 Suppl B:39-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.suppl_2.39.
10
[Effect of efflux pump inhibitor 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine to MIC values of ciprofloxacin in ciprofloxacin resistant gram-negative bacteria].[外排泵抑制剂1-(1-萘甲基)哌嗪对耐环丙沙星革兰氏阴性菌中环丙沙星最低抑菌浓度值的影响]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009 Jul;43(3):457-61.