Suppr超能文献

源自自发方法和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作的心血管自主调节测量指标。

Measures of cardiovascular autonomic regulation derived from spontaneous methods and the Valsalva maneuver.

作者信息

Zöllei Eva, Paprika Dóra, Rudas László

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Cardiology Center, Medical Intensive Care Unit, University of Szeged, Korányi Fasor 7, Szeged 6720, Hungary.

出版信息

Auton Neurosci. 2003 Jan 31;103(1-2):100-5. doi: 10.1016/s1566-0702(02)00151-0.

Abstract

The response of heart rate to a given change of systolic blood pressure is a fundamental characteristic of the cardiovascular system. The assessment of baroreflex gain (BRS) as an index of baroreflex function is based on the quantification of RR interval changes related to blood pressure changes. The spontaneous sequence and cross spectral methods describe baroreflex gain derived from spontaneous fluctuations of these parameters, yielding the up sequence and down sequence BRS and the alfa index. Phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver is also used to calculate cardiac vagal baroreflex gain. In this study, we compared the two spontaneous methods and the Valsalva maneuver in assessing baroreflex gain in 56 healthy volunteers. The BRS values calculated from different methods were as follows: up sequence BRS 12 +/- 8.6 ms/mm Hg, down sequence BRS 10 +/- 6.1 ms/mm Hg, low frequency alfa index 12.1 +/- 8.2 ms/mm Hg, Valsalva BRS 9.7 +/- 7.2 ms/mm Hg. We found close relationship between baroreflex gain derived from up and down sequences (R = 0.91, p < 0.001), down sequence BRS and low frequency alfa index (R = 0.81, p < 0.001); significant correlation between up sequence BRS and low frequency alfa index (R = 0.65, p < 0.001), the Valsalva-derived BRS and down sequence BRS (R = 0.37, p = 0.043), but no correlation between the Valsalva BRS and up sequence BRS, the Valsalva BRS and low frequency alfa index. BRS values calculated by different methods decreased with increasing age. There was no influence of age on mean arterial blood pressure elevation in late phase II of the Valsalva maneuver, nor any indication that the Valsalva BRS was related to the MAP changes. We concluded that all of these methods are useful in calculating baroreflex gain, but owing to the differences in underlying physiological mechanisms, they are not necessarily in correlation with each other.

摘要

心率对收缩压给定变化的反应是心血管系统的一个基本特征。作为压力反射功能指标的压力反射增益(BRS)评估基于与血压变化相关的RR间期变化的量化。自发序列和交叉谱方法描述了从这些参数的自发波动中得出的压力反射增益,得出上升序列和下降序列BRS以及阿尔法指数。瓦尔萨尔瓦动作的第四阶段也用于计算心脏迷走神经压力反射增益。在本研究中,我们比较了56名健康志愿者在评估压力反射增益时的两种自发方法和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作。不同方法计算出的BRS值如下:上升序列BRS为12±8.6毫秒/毫米汞柱,下降序列BRS为10±6.1毫秒/毫米汞柱,低频阿尔法指数为12.1±8.2毫秒/毫米汞柱,瓦尔萨尔瓦动作BRS为9.7±7.2毫秒/毫米汞柱。我们发现上升和下降序列得出的压力反射增益之间存在密切关系(R = 0.91,p < 0.001),下降序列BRS与低频阿尔法指数之间存在密切关系(R = 0.81,p < 0.001);上升序列BRS与低频阿尔法指数之间存在显著相关性(R = 0.65,p < 0.001),瓦尔萨尔瓦动作得出的BRS与下降序列BRS之间存在显著相关性(R = 0.37,p = 0.043),但瓦尔萨尔瓦动作BRS与上升序列BRS之间、瓦尔萨尔瓦动作BRS与低频阿尔法指数之间无相关性。不同方法计算出的BRS值随年龄增长而降低。年龄对瓦尔萨尔瓦动作第二阶段后期平均动脉血压升高无影响,也没有迹象表明瓦尔萨尔瓦动作BRS与平均动脉压变化有关。我们得出结论,所有这些方法在计算压力反射增益方面都很有用,但由于潜在生理机制的差异,它们不一定相互关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验