Science and security. Researchers urged to self-censor sensitive data.
作者信息
Malakoff David
出版信息
Science. 2003 Jan 17;299(5605):321. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5605.321a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Science and security. Researchers urged to self-censor sensitive data.科学与安全。研究人员被敦促对敏感数据进行自我审查。
Science. 2003 Jan 17;299(5605):321. doi: 10.1126/science.299.5605.321a.
2
Science publishing and security concerns.科学出版与安全问题。
Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):737-9; author reply 737-9. doi: 10.1126/science.300.5620.737e.
3
Science and security. Entering the twilight zone of what material to censor.科学与安全。进入审查何种材料的模糊地带。
Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1548. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1548.
4
Public health. National security and the biological research community.公共卫生、国家安全与生物研究界。
Science. 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):753-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1078329.
5
Biologists apprehensive over US moves to censor information flow.生物学家对美国审查信息流的举动感到担忧。
Nature. 2002 Feb 21;415(6874):821. doi: 10.1038/415821a.
6
Biosecurity. Will flu papers lead to new research oversight?生物安全。流感相关论文会引发新的研究监管吗？
Science. 2012 Jan 6;335(6064):20, 22. doi: 10.1126/science.335.6064.20.
7
Public health. Understanding threats to scientific openness.公共卫生。理解对科学开放性的威胁。
Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1898. doi: 10.1126/science.1092493.
8
Issues in biosecurity and biosafety.生物安全与生物安保问题。
Science. 2005 Jun 24;308(5730):1867-8. doi: 10.1126/science.308.5730.1867c.
9
Scientist support for biological weapons controls.科学家对生物武器控制的支持。
Science. 2002 Nov 8;298(5596):1135. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5596.1135.
10
Risks and benefits of dual-use research.两用研究的风险与益处。
Nature. 2005 Jun 16;435(7044):855. doi: 10.1038/435855a.
引用本文的文献
1
The history of biological warfare. Human experimentation, modern nightmares and lone madmen in the twentieth century.生物战的历史。人体实验、现代噩梦与20世纪的独行疯子。
EMBO Rep. 2003 Jun;4 Spec No(Suppl 1):S47-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor849.
Zotero 插件