Gauld Robin
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Manag Med. 2002;16(6):436-50. doi: 10.1108/02689230210450990.
Health sector restructuring has been in vogue, but no country has engaged in as much health sector restructuring as New Zealand where, in a decade, there have been four different public health sector structures. This article discusses New Zealand's four structures with an emphasis on relocating the critical functions of health care planning and purchasing, and on the development of the present district health board system. The four structures include: an area health board system (1989-1991) with planning and purchasing located at "home" in local areas and closely aligned with service provision; a competitive internal market system (1993-1996) which separated planning and purchasing from service provision; a centralised system with a "headquarters" controlling planning and purchasing (1997-1999) while maintaining the distance from provision; and the district health board system currently under development (1999-) which sees purchasing and planning sent home again to regions and linked closely with service provision. The present system entails the devolution of considerable responsibility to the local level, within a framework of strong central government control. Based on New Zealand's experience, the article notes that all but the market structure appear to have provided an adequate environment for effective health care planning and purchasing.
卫生部门改革一直很流行,但没有哪个国家像新西兰那样进行了如此大规模的卫生部门改革。在十年间,新西兰出现了四种不同的公共卫生部门结构。本文讨论新西兰的这四种结构,重点是医疗保健规划和采购关键职能的重新定位,以及当前地区卫生委员会系统的发展。这四种结构包括:一个地区卫生委员会系统(1989 - 1991年),规划和采购职能设在当地,与服务提供紧密结合;一个竞争性内部市场系统(1993 - 1996年),将规划和采购与服务提供分开;一个集中系统,由“总部”控制规划和采购(1997 - 1999年),同时与服务提供保持距离;以及目前正在发展的地区卫生委员会系统(1999年至今),采购和规划职能再次下放至各地区,并与服务提供紧密相连。当前系统在中央政府强有力控制的框架内,将相当大的责任下放到地方层面。基于新西兰的经验,本文指出,除了市场结构外其余结构似乎都为有效的医疗保健规划和采购提供了适当的环境。