Smithers Mark, O'Connell Kathleen, MacFadyen Susan, Chambers Melita, Greenwood Kathryn, Boyce Amanda, Abdul-Jabbar Ibtissam, Barker Kylie, Grimmett Karen, Walpole Euan, Thomas Ranjeny
Department of Surgery, University of Queensland, Queensland. Australia.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003 Jan;52(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s00262-002-0318-y. Epub 2002 Nov 13.
Metastatic melanoma is poorly responsive to treatment, and immunotherapeutic approaches are potentially beneficial. Predictors of clinical response are needed to identify suitable patients. We sought factors associated with melanoma-specific clinical response following intradermal vaccination with autologous melanoma peptide and particulate hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg)-exposed immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC). Nineteen patients with metastatic melanoma received a maximum of 8, 2-weekly vaccinations of DC, exposed to HBsAg in addition to autologous melanoma peptides. A further 3 patients received an otherwise identical vaccine that did not include HBsAg. Patients were assessed 1-2 monthly for safety, disease volume, and cellular responses to HBsAg and melanoma peptide. There was no significant toxicity. Of 19 patients receiving HBsAg-exposed DC, 9 primed or boosted a cellular response to HBsAg, and 10 showed no HBsAg response. HBsAg-specific responses were associated with in vitro T cell responses to melanoma peptides and to phytohemagglutinin (PHA). Zero out of 10 non-HBsAg-responding and 4/9 HBsAg-responding patients achieved objective melanoma-specific clinical responses or disease stabilization - 1 complete and 2 partial responses and 1 case of stable disease ( P=0.018). Development of melanoma-specific cellular immunity and T cell responsiveness to mitogen were greater in the group of patients responding to HBsAg. Therefore stimulation of an immune response to nominal particulate antigen was necessary when presented by melanoma peptide-exposed immature DC, to achieve clinical responses in metastatic melanoma. Since general immune competence may be a determinant of treatment response, it should be assessed in future trials on DC immunotherapy.
转移性黑色素瘤对治疗反应不佳,而免疫治疗方法可能有益。需要临床反应预测指标来识别合适的患者。我们探寻了自体黑色素瘤肽和暴露于乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)的颗粒状乙肝表面抗原的未成熟单核细胞衍生树突状细胞(MDDC)皮内接种后与黑色素瘤特异性临床反应相关的因素。19例转移性黑色素瘤患者接受了最多8次、每2周一次的树突状细胞接种,除自体黑色素瘤肽外还暴露于乙肝表面抗原。另外3例患者接受了一种除不包含乙肝表面抗原外其他方面相同的疫苗。每月对患者进行1 - 2次安全性、疾病体积以及对乙肝表面抗原和黑色素瘤肽的细胞反应评估。未出现明显毒性。在19例接受暴露于乙肝表面抗原的树突状细胞接种的患者中,9例引发或增强了对乙肝表面抗原的细胞反应,10例未出现对乙肝表面抗原的反应。乙肝表面抗原特异性反应与体外T细胞对黑色素瘤肽和植物血凝素(PHA)的反应相关。10例无乙肝表面抗原反应的患者中0例以及9例乙肝表面抗原反应的患者中4例实现了客观的黑色素瘤特异性临床反应或疾病稳定——1例完全缓解、2例部分缓解和1例疾病稳定(P = 0.018)。在对乙肝表面抗原产生反应的患者组中,黑色素瘤特异性细胞免疫的发展以及T细胞对丝裂原的反应性更强。因此,当由暴露于黑色素瘤肽的未成熟树突状细胞呈递时,刺激对名义颗粒抗原的免疫反应对于在转移性黑色素瘤中实现临床反应是必要的。由于一般免疫能力可能是治疗反应的一个决定因素,在未来关于树突状细胞免疫治疗的试验中应进行评估。