• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对需要心脏移植的成年人使用两个受者名单。

Use of two recipient lists for adults requiring heart transplantation.

作者信息

Laks Hillel, Marelli Daniel, Fonarow Gregg C, Hamilton Michele A, Ardehali Abbas, Moriguchi Jaime D, Bresson Jessica, Gjertson David, Kobashigawa Jon A

机构信息

Heart Transplant Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. 90095-1741, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Jan;125(1):49-59. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.62.

DOI:10.1067/mtc.2003.62
PMID:12538985
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An alternate (second) adult recipient list was used to match excluded potential recipients with nonstandard donor hearts that would otherwise be unused.

METHODS

The only absolute criterion for entering the alternate recipient list was age: 65 years old before 1998 and 70 years old after that. Group I consisted of alternates who underwent transplantation, and group II consisted of 401 contemporaneous recipients. Hearts were first offered to regularly listed patients. At least one of the following donor risks accounted for allocation to an alternate: coronary artery disease, reused transplanted heart, high-risk behavior, hepatitis seropositivity, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, high inotropic requirement, left ventricular hypertrophy, age older than 55 years plus another risk, and small donor with no other matches.

RESULTS

Of 102 alternates, 82 were listed were because of age. After a median wait of 107 days, 62 alternates underwent transplantation. Median alternate recipient age was 67 years (vs 54 years, P <.001). Median donor age was 45 years (vs 31 years, P <.001). Survival for alternates at 90 days was 82% (vs 91%, P =.04). Significant recipient predictors of early mortality on multivariable analysis (n = 463) were previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio 2.74, 95% confidence interval 1.37-5.48) and renal dysfunction (odds ratio 1.39, 1.10-176). Alternate listing did not independently predict early or late mortality. Late (>90 days) death rates per 1000 person-months were 4.3 and 3.6 for groups I and II (relative risk 1.2, 0.62-2.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of two adult recipient lists facilitated allocation of unused donor organs. Satisfactory long-term survival supports the use of an alternate recipient list.

摘要

目的

使用备用(第二)成人受者名单,将被排除的潜在受者与否则将被弃用的非标准供体心脏进行匹配。

方法

进入备用受者名单的唯一绝对标准是年龄:1998年以前为65岁,之后为70岁。第一组由接受移植的备用受者组成,第二组由401名同期受者组成。心脏首先提供给常规列出的患者。以下至少一项供体风险因素导致分配给备用受者:冠状动脉疾病、再次移植的心脏、高风险行为、肝炎血清学阳性、左心室射血分数降低、高强心剂需求、左心室肥厚、年龄超过55岁加另一风险因素,以及无其他匹配对象的小供体。

结果

102名备用受者中,82名因年龄被列入名单。中位等待107天后,62名备用受者接受了移植。备用受者的中位年龄为67岁(相比之下,常规受者为54岁,P<.001)。供体的中位年龄为45岁(相比之下,常规供体为31岁,P<.001)。备用受者90天时的生存率为82%(相比之下,常规受者为91%,P=.04)。多变量分析(n=463)中早期死亡的显著受者预测因素为既往心脏手术(比值比2.74,95%置信区间1.37 - 5.48)和肾功能不全(比值比1.39,1.10 - 1.76)。列入备用名单并不能独立预测早期或晚期死亡。第一组和第二组每1000人月的晚期(>90天)死亡率分别为4.3和3.6(相对风险1.2,0.62 - 2.36)。

结论

使用两个成人受者名单有助于未使用供体器官的分配。令人满意的长期生存率支持使用备用受者名单。

相似文献

1
Use of two recipient lists for adults requiring heart transplantation.针对需要心脏移植的成年人使用两个受者名单。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Jan;125(1):49-59. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.62.
2
Outcomes with an alternate list strategy for heart transplantation.心脏移植替代名单策略的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.03.014. Epub 2005 Aug 8.
3
Three-year survival rates for all consecutive heart-only and lung-only transplants performed in Eurotransplant, 1997-1999.1997年至1999年在欧洲移植组织进行的所有连续单纯心脏移植和单纯肺移植的三年生存率。
Clin Transpl. 2003:89-100.
4
Outcome of listing for heart transplantation in infants younger than six months: predictors of death and interval to transplantation. The Pediatric Heart Transplantation Study Group.六个月以下婴儿心脏移植登记的结果:死亡预测因素及移植间隔时间。儿科心脏移植研究组
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Dec;16(12):1255-66.
5
The alternate recipient list for heart transplantation: does it work?心脏移植候补受者名单:它起作用吗?
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Jul;16(7):735-42.
6
Effect of older donor age on risk for mortality after heart transplantation.供体年龄较大对心脏移植后死亡风险的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Sep;78(3):890-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.016.
7
Outcomes in cardiac transplant recipients using allografts from older donors versus mortality on the transplant waiting list; Implications for donor selection criteria.使用老年供体同种异体移植物的心脏移植受者的结局与移植等待名单上的死亡率对比;对供体选择标准的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1553-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.002.
8
Outcomes of patients undergoing transplantation with older donor hearts.接受老年供体心脏移植患者的结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 Jul;15(7):684-91.
9
The University of California at Los Angeles heart transplantation experience.加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校的心脏移植经验。
Clin Transpl. 2005:173-85.
10
Transplantation with older donor hearts for presumed "stable" recipients: an analysis of the Joint International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Registry.为假定“稳定”的受者移植老年供体心脏:国际心肺移植学会/器官共享联合网络胸科登记处的分析
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998 Sep;17(9):901-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Who is the Candidate? The Heart Transplant Evaluation Process.谁是候选人?心脏移植评估过程。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2025 May 15;21(3):13-24. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1512. eCollection 2025.
2
TAVI in a Heart Transplant Recipient-Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature.心脏移植受者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术——罕见病例报告及文献综述
Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 26;11(10):2634. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102634.
3
Impact of Previous Conventional Cardiac Surgery on the Clinical Outcomes After Heart Transplantation.既往常规心脏手术对心脏移植后临床结局的影响。
Transpl Int. 2023 Oct 3;36:11824. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11824. eCollection 2023.
4
Early and long-term results of heart transplantation with reoperative sternotomy.再次开胸心脏移植的早期及长期结果
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2020 Jan 23;28(1):120-126. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2020.18586. eCollection 2020 Jan.
5
The Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY): Second Official Adult Heart Transplant Report.韩国器官移植登记处(KOTRY):第二份成人心脏移植官方报告。
Korean Circ J. 2019 Aug;49(8):724-737. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0392. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
6
Targeting the Innate Immune Response to Improve Cardiac Graft Recovery after Heart Transplantation: Implications for the Donation after Cardiac Death.靶向先天免疫反应以改善心脏移植后心脏移植物恢复:对心脏死亡后捐赠的意义
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jun 17;17(6):958. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060958.
7
Cardiac transplantation for older patients: Characteristics and outcomes in the septuagenarian population.老年患者的心脏移植:七十岁人群的特征与结局
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Mar;35(3):362-369. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.028. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Advances in the understanding and management of heart transplantation.心脏移植的理解与管理进展
F1000Prime Rep. 2015 May 12;7:52. doi: 10.12703/P7-52. eCollection 2015.
9
Coronary revascularization in lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease.肺移植受者合并冠状动脉疾病的冠状动脉血运重建。
Am J Transplant. 2013 Nov;13(11):2978-88. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12435. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
10
Ten-year experience with extended criteria cardiac transplantation.心脏移植扩展标准的 10 年经验。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Nov;6(6):1230-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000296. Epub 2013 Oct 2.