Lipsitch Marc, Bergstrom Carl T, Antia Rustom
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
BMC Med Genet. 2003 Jan 24;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-4-2.
Doherty and Zinkernagel, who discovered that antigen presentation is restricted by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC, called HLA in humans), hypothesized that individuals heterozygous at particular MHC loci might be more resistant to particular infectious diseases than the corresponding homozygotes because heterozygotes could present a wider repertoire of antigens. The superiority of heterozygotes over either corresponding homozygote, which we term allele-specific overdominance, is of direct biological interest for understanding the mechanisms of immune response; it is also a leading explanation for the observation that MHC loci are extremely polymorphic and that these polymorphisms have been maintained through extremely long evolutionary periods. Recent studies have shown that in particular viral infections, heterozygosity at HLA loci was associated with a favorable disease outcome, and such findings have been interpreted as supporting the allele-specific overdominance hypothesis in humans.
An algebraic model is used to define the expected population-wide findings of an epidemiologic study of HLA heterozygosity and disease outcome as a function of allele-specific effects and population genetic parameters of the study population.
We show that overrepresentation of HLA heterozygotes among individuals with favorable disease outcomes (which we term population heterozygote advantage) need not indicate allele-specific overdominance. On the contrary, partly due to a form of confounding by allele frequencies, population heterozygote advantage can occur under a very wide range of assumptions about the relationship between homozygote risk and heterozygote risk. In certain extreme cases, population heterozygote advantage can occur even when every heterozygote is at greater risk of being a case than either corresponding homozygote.
To demonstrate allele-specific overdominance for specific infections in human populations, improved analytic tools and/or larger studies (or studies in populations with limited HLA diversity) are necessary.
多尔蒂和津克纳格尔发现抗原呈递受主要组织相容性复合体(MHC,人类中称为HLA)限制,他们推测特定MHC位点的杂合个体可能比相应的纯合个体对特定传染病更具抵抗力,因为杂合子能够呈递更多种类的抗原。杂合子相对于相应纯合子的优势,我们称之为等位基因特异性超显性,对于理解免疫反应机制具有直接的生物学意义;这也是对MHC位点具有极高多态性且这些多态性在极长的进化时期得以维持这一现象的主要解释。最近的研究表明,在特定病毒感染中,HLA位点的杂合性与良好的疾病转归相关,此类发现被解释为支持人类中的等位基因特异性超显性假说。
使用代数模型来定义一项关于HLA杂合性与疾病转归的流行病学研究在全人群中的预期结果,该结果是等位基因特异性效应和研究人群的群体遗传参数的函数。
我们表明,在疾病转归良好的个体中HLA杂合子的比例过高(我们称之为群体杂合子优势)并不一定表明等位基因特异性超显性。相反,部分由于等位基因频率的一种混杂形式,在关于纯合子风险与杂合子风险之间关系的非常广泛的假设下,都可能出现群体杂合子优势。在某些极端情况下,即使每个杂合子成为病例的风险都高于相应的纯合子,群体杂合子优势也可能出现。
要证明人类群体中特定感染的等位基因特异性超显性,需要改进分析工具和/或进行更大规模的研究(或在HLA多样性有限的人群中开展研究)。