Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜切除术后技术缺陷的术中评估:血管造影与彩色双功超声扫描的比较

Intra-operative assessment of technical defects after carotid endarterectomy: a comparison between angiography and colour duplex scan.

作者信息

Valenti D, Gaggiano A, Berardi G, Ferri M, Mazzei R, Roda G, Palombo D

机构信息

Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Vascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Hospital, Corso Turati 62, 10128 Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Feb;11(1):26-9. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(02)00112-6.

Abstract

We compared the intra-operative diagnostic value of CDS vs IA-DSA in identifying major and minor technical defects after CEA. Between August 1997 and December 1998, 138 consecutive patients undergoing 141 carotid endarterectomies were intra-operatively investigated with colour duplex scan and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Thirty-six (25.5%) technical defects were identified. Four (11.1%) major defects were detected by both methods and they were immediately corrected. Fifteen (41.6%) minor defects were detected by both methods, thirteen (36.1%) minor defects were detected by colour duplex but ignored by angiography. Angiography detected four (11.1%) kinkings missed with the colour duplex. The overall sensitivity of both methods for major defect was 100%. The sensitivity of colour duplex for minor defects was 87% vs 59% for angiography. On the basis of our study, colour duplex could be considered the choice method for quality control after carotid endarterectomy.

摘要

我们比较了彩色多普勒超声(CDS)与动脉内数字减影血管造影(IA-DSA)在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后识别主要和次要技术缺陷方面的术中诊断价值。在1997年8月至1998年12月期间,对连续138例行141次颈动脉内膜切除术的患者进行了术中彩色双功扫描和动脉内数字减影血管造影检查。共发现36处(25.5%)技术缺陷。两种方法均检测到4处(11.1%)主要缺陷,并立即进行了纠正。两种方法均检测到15处(41.6%)次要缺陷,彩色双功扫描检测到13处(36.1%)次要缺陷,但血管造影未检测到。血管造影检测到4处(11.1%)彩色双功扫描漏诊的血管扭曲。两种方法对主要缺陷的总体敏感性均为100%。彩色双功扫描对次要缺陷的敏感性为87%,而血管造影为59%。根据我们的研究,彩色双功扫描可被视为颈动脉内膜切除术后质量控制的首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验