Zimmerman Deborah L, Selick Avrum, Singh Rajinder, Mendelssohn David C
Division of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Feb;18(2):305-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/18.2.305.
Nephrologists have traditionally assumed responsibility for both nephrological and primary care health problems of their dialysis patients. However, given the increasing limitations of nephrology human resources, there is concern that traditional models may fall short of providing comprehensive care.
We studied this issue by distributing three different self-administered surveys to 361 members of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, 325 family physicians, and 163 chronic dialysis patients.
The overall response rate was 61.3% for nephrologists, 51% for family physicians, and 90% for patients. More than 50% of Canadian nephrologists are spending approximately one-third of their time in primary care delivery. The majority of these nephrologists and family physicians agree that nephrologists should not be solely responsible for the primary care of patients on dialysis. Yet, both groups of physicians have concerns that family physicians do not have the knowledge/training and time to care for this complicated group of patients. The patients themselves have more confidence in the primary care that is delivered by their family physicians than by their nephrologists. Unfortunately, there is little communication between the two physician groups either between themselves or with their patients about the services that should be provided by their nephrologist or their family physician.
Nephrologists and family physicians agree that more primary care for dialysis patients should be provided by family physicians. However, the lack of communication between physicians and patients may result in either a duplication or omission of services that are required by this patient population. Dialysis delivery systems in Canada must evolve to ensure that comprehensive chronic dialysis and primary care is provided to these patients through cooperation and communication with primary care physicians.
传统上,肾病学家负责透析患者的肾病及初级保健健康问题。然而,鉴于肾病学人力资源的限制日益增加,人们担心传统模式可能无法提供全面的护理。
我们通过向加拿大肾病学会的361名成员、325名家庭医生和163名慢性透析患者发放三种不同的自行填写式调查问卷来研究这个问题。
肾病学家的总体回复率为61.3%,家庭医生为51%,患者为90%。超过50%的加拿大肾病学家将大约三分之一的时间用于提供初级保健。这些肾病学家和家庭医生中的大多数都认为,肾病学家不应独自负责透析患者的初级保健。然而,两组医生都担心家庭医生没有知识/培训和时间来照顾这一复杂的患者群体。患者自己对家庭医生提供的初级保健比对肾病学家提供的更有信心。不幸的是,这两组医生之间以及他们与患者之间几乎没有就肾病学家或家庭医生应提供的服务进行沟通。
肾病学家和家庭医生一致认为,家庭医生应为透析患者提供更多的初级保健。然而,医生与患者之间缺乏沟通可能导致该患者群体所需服务的重复或遗漏。加拿大的透析服务系统必须发展,以确保通过与初级保健医生的合作与沟通,为这些患者提供全面的慢性透析和初级保健。