Sekkarie M, Cosma M, Mendelssohn D
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Jul;38(1):36-41. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.25179.
Research from Canada and the United States suggests that not offering dialysis to patients who might benefit still occurs. This study was conducted to investigate nonreferral and nonacceptance to dialysis by primary care physicians (PCPs) and nephrologists in these countries. We surveyed a random sample of Canadian and US PCPs and nephrologists concerning their attitudes toward and experience with withholding dialysis in patients with advanced chronic renal failure. In response to a question about whether the physician believes there should be an age beyond which dialysis should not be offered, 12% of Canadian PCPs, 20% of US PCPs, 4% of Canadian nephrologists, and 9% of US nephrologists answered yes. When asked about their recommendations concerning dialysis initiation in 10 vignettes of patients with impending end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the responses of Canadian and US physicians were similar. PCPs compared with nephrologists were less likely to recommend dialysis in cases with physical illnesses and more likely to recommend it in cases with neuropsychiatric impairments. Over a 3-year period, 13% of Canadian PCPs and 19% of US PCPs reported nonreferral to dialysis at least once. Withholding rates were 25% for Canadian PCPs, 16% for US PCPs, 13% for Canadian nephrologists, and 17% for US nephrologists. We conclude that although nonreferral of patients who might benefit from dialysis still occurs, it does not seem to be common, and the attitudes of Canadian and US physicians toward this issue are similar and could not entirely account for the much greater incidence of treated ESRD in the United States. PCPs and nephrologists should continue to be educated about the modern criteria for patient selection for dialysis.
加拿大和美国的研究表明,不向可能受益的患者提供透析的情况仍然存在。开展这项研究是为了调查这些国家的初级保健医生(PCP)和肾病科医生不转诊患者接受透析以及患者不接受透析的情况。我们对加拿大和美国的初级保健医生和肾病科医生进行了随机抽样调查,询问他们对晚期慢性肾衰竭患者停止透析的态度和经验。在回答关于医生是否认为应该有一个年龄界限,超过这个年龄就不应提供透析的问题时,12%的加拿大初级保健医生、20%的美国初级保健医生、4%的加拿大肾病科医生和9%的美国肾病科医生回答是。当被问及在10个即将进入终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的案例中关于开始透析的建议时,加拿大和美国医生的回答相似。与肾病科医生相比,初级保健医生在有身体疾病的案例中不太可能建议透析,而在有神经精神障碍的案例中更有可能建议透析。在3年期间,13%的加拿大初级保健医生和19%的美国初级保健医生报告至少有一次未转诊患者接受透析。加拿大初级保健医生的停止透析率为25%,美国初级保健医生为16%,加拿大肾病科医生为13%,美国肾病科医生为17%。我们得出结论,虽然不向可能从透析中受益的患者转诊的情况仍然存在,但似乎并不常见,而且加拿大和美国医生对这个问题的态度相似,不能完全解释美国接受治疗的终末期肾病发病率高得多的原因。应该继续对初级保健医生和肾病科医生进行关于透析患者选择的现代标准的教育。