Montgomery Stuart, Ferguson James M, Schwartz Gerri E
Imperial College School of Medicine, London, U.K.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Feb;23(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200302000-00008.
We examined the effectiveness of reboxetine, a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NRI), compared with placebo for the treatment of patients with severe major depression (defined as a score on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D] >/=25). Data were obtained from four prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of the efficacy of reboxetine (8 to 10 mg/d) over 4 to 8 weeks in patients with major depression. In three of the trials, reboxetine produced a significantly greater reduction than placebo in mean HAM-D scores from baseline to the last clinical assessment (p < 0.001). There were significantly more responders to treatment (defined as a reduction in HAM-D score >50% between baseline and the last follow-up observation) treated with reboxetine than placebo in three trials. The overall mean responder rate with reboxetine was 63% (range: 56-74%) compared with 36% (range: 20-52%) with placebo. These results demonstrate that reboxetine is significantly more effective than placebo in a subgroup of patients with severe depression.
我们研究了去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(NRI)瑞波西汀与安慰剂相比,治疗重度重度抑郁症患者(定义为17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表[HAM-D]评分≥25)的有效性。数据来自四项关于瑞波西汀(8至10毫克/天)在4至8周内治疗重度抑郁症患者疗效的前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。在三项试验中,从基线到最后一次临床评估,瑞波西汀使平均HAM-D评分降低的幅度显著大于安慰剂(p<0.001)。在三项试验中,接受瑞波西汀治疗的患者中,治疗反应者(定义为基线至最后一次随访观察期间HAM-D评分降低>50%)显著多于接受安慰剂治疗的患者。瑞波西汀的总体平均反应率为63%(范围:56-74%),而安慰剂为36%(范围:20-52%)。这些结果表明,在重度抑郁症亚组患者中,瑞波西汀比安慰剂显著更有效。