Shen Judith, Joynt Gavin M, Critchley Lester A H, Tan Ian K S, Lee Anna
Department of Anesthesia & IC, Pamela Youde Nethersole Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong, Peoples Republic of China.
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):293-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00047.
To identify a consensus of opinion regarding the content of an intensive care core syllabus for undergraduate medical students and factors that may limit its teaching.
Cross-sectional postal survey containing 35 items ranging from department structure to curriculum content and factors that limit the teaching of intensive care.
English-speaking medical schools (n = 210) listed in the 1986 World Health Organization Directory.
Of 122 (58%) returned questionnaires, a 45% return was achieved from the United States and 86% from non-U.S. countries. Most respondents (84%) considered teaching undergraduate intensive care to be essential; however, teaching intensive care was compulsory in only 31% of schools. Many schools (43%) reported recent changes to their intensive care curriculum. Most respondents (60%) thought that intensive care specialists should teach and that each student required a median (interquartile range) of 20 (10-80) hrs of teacher contact time. Resuscitation skills were taught in 98% of schools. In comparison, 63% of schools had no intensive care syllabus. More than 90% of respondents thought that the intensive care syllabus should include the following: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, assessment and management of the acutely ill patient; management of respiratory, circulatory, and multiple organ system failure (including systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis); management of the unconscious patient; early postoperative care; and communication skills and ethics as they relate to end-of-life issues. Factors that limited intensive care teaching were lack of staff, funding, and time dedicated to teaching and excessive clinical workload. Student performance in intensive care was assessed by 66% of schools, but only 28% used a written or oral examination.
By surveying a wide range of medical schools internationally, we have been able to define an undergraduate intensive care syllabus that could be delivered in 20 hrs or 1 wk of dedicated teaching time. Factors that impede the provision of undergraduate intensive care teaching are a lack of staff, funding, and dedicated teaching time.
就本科医学生重症监护核心教学大纲的内容以及可能限制其教学的因素达成共识。
横断面邮政调查,包含35个项目,内容涵盖科室结构、课程内容以及限制重症监护教学的因素。
1986年世界卫生组织名录中列出的英语授课医学院校(n = 210)。
在122份(58%)返回的问卷中,美国的问卷回收率为45%,非美国国家的问卷回收率为86%。大多数受访者(84%)认为本科重症监护教学至关重要;然而,只有31%的学校将重症监护教学设为必修课。许多学校(43%)报告称其重症监护课程近期有变动。大多数受访者(60%)认为应由重症监护专科医生授课,且每位学生平均(四分位间距)需要20(10 - 80)小时的教师接触时间。98%的学校教授复苏技能。相比之下,63%的学校没有重症监护教学大纲。超过90%的受访者认为重症监护教学大纲应包括以下内容:心肺复苏、急重症患者的评估与管理;呼吸、循环及多器官系统衰竭(包括全身炎症反应综合征和脓毒症)的管理;昏迷患者的管理;术后早期护理;以及与临终问题相关的沟通技巧和伦理。限制重症监护教学的因素包括缺乏师资、资金以及用于教学的时间,还有临床工作量过大。66%的学校对学生在重症监护方面的表现进行评估,但只有28%的学校采用笔试或口试。
通过对国际上众多医学院校进行调查,我们得以确定一个本科重症监护教学大纲,该大纲可在20小时或1周的专门教学时间内完成。阻碍本科重症监护教学的因素包括缺乏师资、资金和专门的教学时间。