Pulido Jose S
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, UIC Eye Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:85-106; discussion 106-7.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Rheopheresis blood filtration to treat intermediate- to late-stage preangiogenic age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with soft drusen.
Multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
First 43 randomized patients (28 Rheopheresis and 15 placebo-control patients) with available baseline and 3-month postbaseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurements and intermediate- to late-stage preangiogenic AMD with multiple large soft drusen and elevated serum levels of targeted macromolecules.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive eight Rheopheresis or eight placebo procedures over 10 weeks.
ETDRS BCVA measurements at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postbaseline.
In primary eyes, the mean LogMAR line difference between Rheopheresis and placebo-control eyes was 1.6 lines at 12 months postbaseline; the difference was significant throughout the first posttreatment year (P = .0011, repeated measures analysis). Thirteen percent of Rheopheresis compared with 0% of placebo-control eyes had a > or = 3-line improvement in BCVA at 12 months postbaseline. Four percent of Rheopheresis compared with 18% of placebo-control eyes had a > or = 3-line loss in BCVA. The subgroup of patients whose primary eyes had baseline BCVA worse than 20/40 demonstrated a mean LogMAR difference between Rheopheresis and placebo-control eyes equaling 3.0 lines at 12 months postbaseline; the difference was significant throughout the first posttreatment year (P = .0014, repeated measures analysis). Sixteen percent of Rheopheresis compared with 0% of the placebo-control eyes had a > or = 3-line improvement in BCVA at 12 months postbaseline. Five percent of Rheopheresis compared with 29% of placebo-control eyes had a > or = 3-line loss in BCVA. Fifty-eight percent of Rheopheresis eyes improved to 20/40 or better, compared with 14% of placebo-control eyes. No serious treatment-related adverse events were observed.
Rheopheresis demonstrated statistically significant and clinically relevant effects on BCVA when compared with placebo controls for the 12-month study interval. Untreated patients with BCVA worse than 20/40 with intermediate- to late-stage preangiogenic AMD, soft drusen, and elevated blood factors were at risk for substantial visual loss. A sample size larger than 43 patients is important to provide a basis for widespread adoption of novel therapeutic options for AMD such as Rheopheresis. Therefore, enrollment to 150 patients is continuing.
评估血液成分单采滤过术治疗伴有软性玻璃膜疣的中晚期血管生成前期年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的安全性和有效性。
多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
最初43例随机分组患者(28例接受血液成分单采滤过术,15例接受安慰剂对照),有可用的基线及基线后3个月的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)测量值,且患有伴有多个大软性玻璃膜疣和靶向大分子血清水平升高的中晚期血管生成前期AMD。
患者被随机分配在10周内接受8次血液成分单采滤过术或8次安慰剂治疗。
基线、基线后3、6、9和12个月时的ETDRS BCVA测量值。
在主要眼组中,血液成分单采滤过术组与安慰剂对照组在基线后12个月时的平均LogMAR行差为1.6行;在治疗后的第一年中差异均有统计学意义(P = 0.0011,重复测量分析)。血液成分单采滤过术组中13%的患者在基线后12个月时BCVA改善≥3行,而安慰剂对照组为0%。血液成分单采滤过术组中4%的患者在基线后12个月时BCVA下降≥3行,而安慰剂对照组为18%。主要眼基线BCVA差于20/40的患者亚组在基线后12个月时血液成分单采滤过术组与安慰剂对照组的平均LogMAR差异为3.0行;在治疗后的第一年中差异均有统计学意义(P = 0.0014,重复测量分析)。血液成分单采滤过术组中16%的患者在基线后12个月时BCVA改善≥3行,而安慰剂对照组为0%。血液成分单采滤过术组中5%的患者在基线后12个月时BCVA下降≥3行,而安慰剂对照组为29%。血液成分单采滤过术组中58%的眼视力改善至20/40或更好,而安慰剂对照组为14%。未观察到严重的治疗相关不良事件。
在12个月的研究期间,与安慰剂对照相比,血液成分单采滤过术对BCVA有统计学意义且具有临床相关性的影响。基线BCVA差于20/40、患有中晚期血管生成前期AMD、软性玻璃膜疣且血液因子升高的未治疗患者有视力大幅丧失的风险。样本量大于43例患者对于为广泛采用如血液成分单采滤过术等AMD新治疗方案提供依据很重要。因此,正在继续招募150例患者。