Heyland Daren K, Schroter-Noppe Deborah, Drover John W, Jain Minto, Keefe Laurie, Dhaliwal Rupinder, Day Andrew
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Jan-Feb;27(1):74-83. doi: 10.1177/014860710302700174.
The purpose of this project was to describe current nutrition support practice in the critical care setting and to identify interventions to target for quality improvement initiatives.
We conducted a cross-sectional national survey of dietitians working in intensive care units (ICUs) across Canada to document various aspects of nutrition support practice.
Of the 79 dietitians sent study materials, 66 responded (83%). Sixteen of 66 sites (24.2%) reported the presence of a nutrition support team, and 35 of 66 (53%) used a standard enteral feeding protocol. Dietitians retrospectively abstracted data from charts of all patients in the ICU on April 18, 2001. Of 702 patients, 313 (44.6%) received enteral nutrition only, 50 (7.1%) received parenteral nutrition only, 60 (8.5%) received both, and 279 (39.7%) received no form of nutrition support. Enteral nutrition was initiated on 1.6 days (median) after admission to ICU; 10.7% of patients were initiated on day 1. Of those receiving any form of nutrition support, on average, patients received 58% of their prescribed amounts of calories and protein over the first 12 days in the ICU. Of all days on enteral feeds, patients received feeds into the small bowel on 381 of 2321 (16.4%) days. The mean head of the bed elevation for all patients was 30 degrees. Controlling for differences in patient characteristics, site factors contributing the most successful application of nutrition support included the amount of funded dietitians per ICU bed, size of ICU, and the fact that the ICU was located in an academic setting.
A significant number of critically ill patients did not receive any form of nutrition support for the study period. Those that did receive nutrition support did not meet their prescribed energy or protein needs, especially earlier in the course of their illness. Significant opportunities to improve provision of nutrition support to critically ill patients exist.
本项目旨在描述重症监护环境下当前的营养支持实践情况,并确定质量改进计划的目标干预措施。
我们对加拿大各地重症监护病房(ICU)工作的营养师进行了一项横断面全国性调查,以记录营养支持实践的各个方面。
在收到研究材料的79名营养师中,66人做出了回应(83%)。66个机构中有16个(24.2%)报告有营养支持团队,66个中有35个(53%)使用标准肠内喂养方案。营养师回顾性地从2001年4月18日ICU所有患者的病历中提取数据。在702名患者中,313名(44.6%)仅接受肠内营养,50名(7.1%)仅接受肠外营养,60名(8.5%)两者都接受,279名(39.7%)未接受任何形式的营养支持。肠内营养在入住ICU后1.6天(中位数)开始;10.7%的患者在第1天开始。在接受任何形式营养支持的患者中,在ICU的前12天里,患者平均摄入了规定热量和蛋白质的58%。在所有肠内喂养的日子里,患者在2321天中的381天(16.4%)将喂养管置入小肠。所有患者床头抬高的平均角度为30度。在控制患者特征差异后,营养支持应用最成功的机构因素包括每个ICU床位配备的营养师数量、ICU规模以及ICU位于学术环境中这一事实。
在研究期间,相当数量的重症患者未接受任何形式的营养支持。那些接受了营养支持的患者未达到规定的能量或蛋白质需求,尤其是在病程早期。存在显著改善重症患者营养支持提供情况的机会。