Maier M, Maier-Heidkamp P, Lehnert M, Wirbel R, Marzi I
Klinik für Hand-, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Homburg/Saar, Hamburg.
Unfallchirurg. 2003 Jan;106(1):48-54. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0481-9.
The clinical and radiological results of femoral shaft fractures in childhood were evaluated and compared in relation to different treatment modalities. One hundred and one children (mean age 5+/-0,4 years) were treated between 1990 to 1999. 38% of the patients were treated conservatively (mean age 2,2+/-0,5 years), 32% of the patients (mean age 6+/-0,5 years) were treated by external fixation, 17% were treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN, mean age 5,6+/-0,8 years) and 12% underwent other internal fixation procedures. The duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in the conservative treatment group (18+/-1,6 days) than in the external fixator (12+/-1,2 days) as well as in the ESIN group (8+/-0,9 days). Radiological controls revealed a significantly better reduction of the fracture by operative procedures (external fixator,ESIN) as compared to conservative management. Complications, i.e. secondary dislocation or infection, occurred in 25% of patients in the external fixator group,6% of the ESIN patients, and in 10% of the conservatively treated patients. Late complications,i.e.weight bearing dependent pain or hypertrophic scarring,were developed in both the conservative treatment group (4%) and in the external fixator group (19%); however,no late complications were seen in the ESIN group. While each method examined is known to be suitable for treatment of femoral shaft fractures in childhood,each has defined indications. Also there is a limited possibility of fracture reduction in conservative treatment this method is indicated in younger children (<4 years) where spontaneous bone remodelling is likely. For older children the ESIN method showed a low rate of complications and demonstrates the best long term results. When ESIN is not possible because of local soft tissue damage,additional injuries,or in complex fractures, the external fixator proved to be an alternative treatment for femoral shaft fractures.
对儿童股骨干骨折的临床和放射学结果进行了评估,并就不同治疗方式进行了比较。1990年至1999年期间共治疗了101名儿童(平均年龄5±0.4岁)。38%的患者接受保守治疗(平均年龄2.2±0.5岁),32%的患者(平均年龄6±0.5岁)接受外固定治疗,17%接受弹性稳定髓内钉固定(ESIN,平均年龄5.6±0.8岁),12%接受其他内固定手术。保守治疗组的住院时间(18±1.6天)明显长于外固定组(12±1.2天)以及ESIN组(8±0.9天)。放射学检查显示,与保守治疗相比,手术治疗(外固定、ESIN)的骨折复位明显更好。外固定组25%的患者、ESIN组6%的患者以及保守治疗组10%的患者出现并发症,即继发性脱位或感染。保守治疗组(4%)和外固定组(19%)均出现晚期并发症,即负重依赖性疼痛或肥厚性瘢痕形成;然而,ESIN组未出现晚期并发症。虽然已知每种检查方法都适用于儿童股骨干骨折的治疗,但每种方法都有明确的适应证。此外,保守治疗中骨折复位的可能性有限,该方法适用于可能发生自发性骨重塑的年幼儿童(<4岁)。对于年龄较大的儿童,ESIN方法并发症发生率较低,显示出最佳的长期效果。当由于局部软组织损伤、额外损伤或复杂骨折而无法进行ESIN时,外固定器被证明是股骨干骨折的替代治疗方法。