• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Vaginal sacrospinous fixation: experience in a district general hospital.

作者信息

Elghorori M R M, Ahmed A A, Sadhukhan M, Al-Taher H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, Norfolk, UK.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;22(6):658-62. doi: 10.1080/014436121000020484.

DOI:10.1080/014436121000020484
PMID:12554258
Abstract

This is an observational retrospective study, which included 77 patients who underwent sacrospinous fixation (SSF) over a period of 3 years in a district general hospital. Casenotes were reviewed and all patients were invited to attend a further review appointment (14-49 months). The object was to determine short- and long-term success of SSF,particularly in elderly (28% were > or = 70 years), obese (24.7%) and medically compromised (64.9%) patients. Fifty-two patients (67.5%) had previous gynaecological procedures, while the remaining 25 (32.5%) had no previous surgery. Intra- and postoperative complications were 3.9% and 32.5%, respectively. There was considerable relief of patients' symptoms at both short- and long-term followup, while the rate of recurrence of vault prolapse was 10.3%. Our experience suggests that SSF appears to be a safe and effective procedure, especially for those who may constitute surgical or anaesthetic risks. It has a reasonable success rate, good postoperative recovery and acceptable long-term results.

摘要

相似文献

1
Vaginal sacrospinous fixation: experience in a district general hospital.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;22(6):658-62. doi: 10.1080/014436121000020484.
2
Twenty-five sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures in a district general hospital: our experience.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 May;25(4):361-3. doi: 10.1080/01443610500118731.
3
Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement.使用带网片置入和加强的骶棘韧带固定术修复复发性阴道穹窿脱垂。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Oct;84(10):992-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00821.x.
4
Short-term and long-term follow-up of abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: initial experience in a district general hospital.阴道穹窿脱垂腹骶阴道固定术的短期和长期随访:一家地区综合医院的初步经验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Sep;22(5):532-6. doi: 10.1080/0144361021000003708.
5
Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension.骶棘肌弓状韧带悬吊术的安全性和有效性。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13(5):308-13. doi: 10.1007/s001920200067.
6
Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.阴道骶棘韧带固定术和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(6):733-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340701332811.
7
Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse.阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗明显子宫阴道和穹窿脱垂的长期疗效
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Aug;127(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.028. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
8
Transvaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse using autologous fascia lata graft.使用自体阔筋膜移植进行阴道内肠膨出和阴道穹窿脱垂修复术。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(7):874-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340500342052.
9
Comparison of effectiveness of vaginal and abdominal routes in treating severe uterovaginal or vault prolapse.阴道途径与腹部途径治疗重度子宫阴道脱垂或穹窿脱垂的疗效比较。
Singapore Med J. 2004 Oct;45(10):475-81.
10
High levator myorrhaphy for transvaginal suspension of the vaginal apex: long-term results.高位提肌缝合术用于经阴道阴道顶端悬吊术:长期结果
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):2047-52; discussion 2052. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.028. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Effect of Uterosacral and Cardinal Ligament Fixation versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of Vaginal Vault Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.经阴道子宫穹窿脱垂行骶骨固定与主骶韧带固定的临床效果比较:一项回顾性分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2023 Jun 3;2023:1489928. doi: 10.1155/2023/1489928. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Using Minimally Invasive Anchorage.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Sep;79(9):976-982. doi: 10.1055/a-0846-5726. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
3
Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?标准化阴道骶棘韧带固定术对住院医师而言是一种安全的教学手术吗?
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar;22(3):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1341-8. Epub 2010 Dec 10.