Suppr超能文献

在原发性腹股沟疝修补术中,网状假体与腹直肌前鞘三角形皮瓣的比较。

Mesh prosthesis versus triangular flap from the anterior sheath of the abdominal rectus muscle in primary inguinal hernia repair.

作者信息

Guzmán-Valdivia Gömez Gilberto

机构信息

Regional General Hospital No. 1 Gabriel Mancera, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

J Invest Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;16(1):45-50.

Abstract

A study was carried out to compare the use of two different tension-free surgical techniques, for the repair of primary inguinal hernia in cases without complications. The study was carried out on 91 consecutive patients who presented with primary and uncomplicated inguinal hernia. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 42 patients whose inguinal hernia was repaired by means of the application of a triangular flap rotated from the anterior sheath of the abdominal rectus muscle and then sutured to the inguinal ligament with non-continuous and nonabsorbable suture 00. Group II consisted of 49 patients whose inguinal hernia was repaired by tension-free hernioplasty, placing a mesh umbrella plug in the deep inguinal orifice and, if necessary, mesh reinforcement to the floor of the inguinal canal (the Gilbert technique). There were no statistically significant differences with regard to age, sex, hernia evolution time, trans- or postoperative complications, or hernia recurrence during an average follow-up time of 3 years. Patients in the flap group required significantly more surgery time and postoperative analgesics. Cost analysis showed that patients receiving a muscle sheath flap spent less money on the actual surgical procedure, given the saving on the purchase of a prosthetic mesh. However, when taking into account the greater need for analgesia and the longer time in the operating theater, there was no difference in overall cost between the two procedures. Inguinal hernia repair using a triangular flap from the anterior sheath of the abdominal rectus muscle is an additional surgical procedure that can be utilized in cases where prosthetic mesh repair is not feasible.

摘要

一项研究旨在比较两种不同的无张力手术技术在无并发症的原发性腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。该研究对91例连续出现原发性且无并发症的腹股沟疝患者进行。患者被随机分为两组。第一组由42例患者组成,其腹股沟疝通过从腹直肌前鞘旋转的三角形皮瓣进行修复,然后用00号非连续、不可吸收缝线缝合至腹股沟韧带。第二组由49例患者组成,其腹股沟疝通过无张力疝修补术进行修复,在腹股沟深环放置网状伞塞,必要时对腹股沟管底部进行网状加固(吉尔伯特技术)。在平均3年的随访时间内,两组在年龄、性别、疝发展时间、术中或术后并发症以及疝复发方面均无统计学显著差异。皮瓣组患者所需的手术时间和术后镇痛药明显更多。成本分析表明,由于节省了人工合成补片的购买费用,接受肌鞘皮瓣手术的患者在实际手术过程中花费较少。然而,考虑到对镇痛的更大需求和在手术室的更长时间,两种手术的总成本没有差异。使用腹直肌前鞘的三角形皮瓣进行腹股沟疝修补是一种额外的手术方法,可用于人工合成补片修补不可行的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验