Suppr超能文献

系统发育不平衡:分类水平很重要。

Phylogeny imbalance: taxonomic level matters.

作者信息

Purvis Andy, Agapow Paul-Michael

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK.

出版信息

Syst Biol. 2002 Dec;51(6):844-54. doi: 10.1080/10635150290102546.

Abstract

Two lines of evidence indicate that the degree of symmetry in phylogenetic topologies differs at different hierarchical levels. First, in a set of 61 phylogenies with superspecific taxa as their terminals, trees were on average more unbalanced (asymmetric) when the species richness of terminals was considered than when it was not. Second, nodes with a given number of higher taxa descended from them were on average more unbalanced than were nodes with the same number of species as descendants. There are several possible reasons--some biological, some artifactual--for the differences. Whatever the reason, these results caution against treating species-level and higher level phylogenies as equivalent when considering tree shape. The imbalance measure adopted here permits the use of trees that contain polytomies, facilitating a larger sample than has been achieved previously.

摘要

有两条证据表明,系统发育拓扑结构的对称程度在不同层次水平上有所不同。首先,在一组以超特定分类单元为终端的61个系统发育树中,考虑终端物种丰富度时,树平均比不考虑时更不平衡(不对称)。其次,从给定数量的高级分类单元衍生而来的节点平均比具有相同数量物种作为后代的节点更不平衡。这些差异有几个可能的原因——一些是生物学原因,一些是人为原因。无论原因是什么,这些结果提醒我们,在考虑树形时,不要将物种水平和更高层次的系统发育树视为等同。这里采用的不平衡度量允许使用包含多歧分支的树,从而能够获得比以前更大的样本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验