Rowell N P, Gleeson F V
Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent ME16 9QQ, UK.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2002 Oct;14(5):338-51. doi: 10.1053/clon.2002.0095.
To conduct a systematic review to determine the relative effectiveness of treatments currently employed in the management of superior vena caval obstruction (SVCO).
Electronic searching of the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, Medline and Embase with identification of further studies from references cited in trials identified by electronic searching.
Both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials in which patients with carcinoma of the bronchus and SVCO had been treated with any combination of steroids, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or insertion of an expandable metal stent.
There were three randomized and 98 non-randomized studies of which two and 44 respectively met the inclusion criteria.
Superior vena caval obstruction was present at diagnosis in 10.0% of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 1.7% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In one small randomized trial in SCLC, the rate of SVCO relapse was not significantly reduced by giving radiotherapy on completion of chemotherapy. In another, in NSCLC, the addition of induction chemotherapy to a course of synchronous chemo-radiotherapy did not provide greater relief of SVCO. In SCLC chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy relieved SVCO in 77%; 17% of those treated had a recurrence of SVCO. In NSCLC, 60% had relief of SVCO following chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy; 19% of those treated had a recurrence of SVCO. Insertion of an SVC stent relieved SVCO in 95%; 11% of those treated had further SVCO but recanalization was possible in the majority resulting in a long-term patency rate of 92%. Morbidity following stent insertion was greater if thrombolytics were administered.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are effective in relieving SVCO in a proportion of patients whilst stent insertion may provide relief in a higher proportion and more rapidly. The effectiveness of steroids and the optimal timing of stent insertion (whether at diagnosis or following failure of other modalities) remain uncertain.
进行一项系统评价,以确定目前用于治疗上腔静脉阻塞(SVCO)的各种治疗方法的相对有效性。
通过电子检索Cochrane临床试验注册库、Medline和Embase,并从电子检索所识别的试验中引用的参考文献中识别其他研究。
随机对照试验和非随机对照试验,其中支气管癌合并SVCO的患者接受了类固醇、化疗、放疗或置入可扩张金属支架的任何组合治疗。
有三项随机研究和98项非随机研究,其中分别有两项和44项符合纳入标准。
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者中10.0%在诊断时存在上腔静脉阻塞,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中1.7%存在该情况。在一项针对SCLC的小型随机试验中,化疗结束后进行放疗并未显著降低SVCO复发率。在另一项针对NSCLC的试验中,同步放化疗疗程中加用诱导化疗并未使SVCO得到更大程度缓解。在SCLC中,化疗和/或放疗使77%的患者SVCO得到缓解;17%接受治疗的患者SVCO复发。在NSCLC中,60%的患者化疗和/或放疗后SVCO得到缓解;19%接受治疗的患者SVCO复发。置入上腔静脉支架使95%的患者SVCO得到缓解;11%接受治疗的患者再次出现SVCO,但大多数患者可再通,长期通畅率为92%。如果使用溶栓药物,支架置入后的发病率更高。
化疗和放疗可使部分患者的SVCO得到缓解,而置入支架可能使更高比例的患者更快地得到缓解。类固醇的有效性以及支架置入的最佳时机(诊断时或其他治疗方式失败后)仍不确定。