Agar Michael, Reisinger Heather Schacht
Friends Social Research Centre, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;26(3):371-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1021261820808.
The law enforcement and treatment policies of the Nixon administration are often credited with ending the epidemic of heroin addiction that rose in America's cities in the 1960s. In this article it is argued that although the interventions did in fact cause a major change in heroin distribution and use, the epidemic did not end in any simple way. The decline in heroin and increase in methadone that resulted from the Nixon policies lead to a shift for many addicts in both clinical and street settings from one narcotic to another. The temporary shortage of heroin that resulted from law enforcement was quickly compensated for with methadone, as well as with new distribution systems from Southeast Asia and Mexico. In the end, the interventions caused a change in an enduring "heroin system," a change that left that system in a stronger form in terms of supply and in a situation of continuing growth in terms of the number of addicts.
尼克松政府的执法和治疗政策常被认为终结了20世纪60年代在美国城市中兴起的海洛因成瘾流行潮。本文认为,尽管这些干预措施确实导致了海洛因分销和使用的重大变化,但这场流行潮并非以任何简单的方式结束。尼克松政策导致的海洛因减少和美沙酮增加,使许多成瘾者在临床和街头环境中从一种麻醉品转向另一种麻醉品。执法导致的海洛因暂时短缺很快通过美沙酮以及来自东南亚和墨西哥的新分销系统得到了弥补。最终,这些干预措施导致了一个持久的“海洛因体系”的变化,这种变化使该体系在供应方面以更强大的形式存在,在成瘾者数量方面处于持续增长的状态。