Brooks Matthew B, Morley Paul S, Dargatz David A, Hyatt Doreene R, Salman M D, Akey Bruce L
Animal Population Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003 Jan 15;222(2):168-73. doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.222.168.
To describe antimicrobial susceptibility testing practices of veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States and evaluate the feasibility of collating this information for the purpose of monitoring antimicrobial resistance in bacterial isolates from animals.
Cross-sectional study.
A questionnaire was mailed to veterinary diagnostic laboratories throughout the United States to identify those laboratories that conduct susceptibility testing. Nonrespondent laboratories were followed up through telephone contact and additional mailings. Data were gathered regarding methods of susceptibility testing, standardization of methods, data management, and types of isolates tested.
Eighty-six of 113 (76%) laboratories responded to the survey, and 64 of the 86 (74%) routinely performed susceptibility testing on bacterial isolates from animals. Thirty-four of the 36 (94%) laboratories accredited by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians responded to the survey. Laboratories reported testing > 160,000 bacterial isolates/y. Fifty-one (88%) laboratories reported using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test to evaluate antimicrobial susceptibility; this accounted for 65% of the isolates tested. Most (87%) laboratories used the NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) documents for test interpretation. Seventy-five percent of the laboratories performed susceptibility testing on bacterial isolates only when they were potential pathogens.
The veterinary diagnostic laboratories represent a comprehensive source of data that is not easily accessible in the United States. Variability in testing methods and data storage would present challenges for data aggregation, summary, and interpretation.
描述美国兽医诊断实验室的抗菌药物敏感性检测实践,并评估整理这些信息以监测动物细菌分离株中抗菌药物耐药性的可行性。
横断面研究。
向美国各地的兽医诊断实验室邮寄问卷,以确定那些进行敏感性检测的实验室。对未回复的实验室通过电话联系和再次邮寄进行跟进。收集有关敏感性检测方法、方法标准化、数据管理以及检测的分离株类型的数据。
113个实验室中有86个(76%)回复了调查,86个实验室中有64个(74%)常规对动物细菌分离株进行敏感性检测。美国兽医实验室诊断协会认可的36个实验室中有34个(94%)回复了调查。实验室报告每年检测超过160,000株细菌分离株。51个(88%)实验室报告使用 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法评估抗菌药物敏感性;这占检测分离株的65%。大多数(87%)实验室使用 NCCLS(国家临床实验室标准委员会)文件进行检测结果解读。75%的实验室仅在细菌分离株为潜在病原体时才进行敏感性检测。
兽医诊断实验室是美国不易获取的全面数据来源。检测方法和数据存储的差异将给数据汇总、总结和解读带来挑战。