Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚兽医诊断实验室的抗菌药敏试验。

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Australian veterinary diagnostic laboratories.

作者信息

Hardefeldt L Y, Marenda M, Crabb H, Stevenson M A, Gilkerson J R, Billman-Jacobe H, Browning G F

机构信息

Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.

National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Peter Doherty Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Vet J. 2018 Apr;96(4):142-146. doi: 10.1111/avj.12685.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The national strategy for tackling antimicrobial resistance highlights the need for antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary practice and for surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility in veterinary pathogens. Diagnostic laboratories have an important role in facilitating both of these processes, but it is unclear whether data from veterinary diagnostic laboratories are similar enough to allow for compilation and if there is consistent promotion of appropriate antimicrobial use embedded in the approaches of different laboratories to susceptibility testing.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting procedures by Australian veterinary diagnostic laboratories was conducted in 2017 using an online questionnaire. All 18 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in Australia completed the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion was the method predominantly used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and was used to evaluate 86% of all isolates, although two different protocols were used across the 18 laboratories (CLSI 15/18, CDS 3/18). Minimum inhibitory concentrations were never reported by 61% of laboratories. Common isolates were consistently reported on across all species, except for gram-negative isolates in pigs, for which there was some variation in the approach to reporting. There was considerable diversity in the panels of antimicrobials used for susceptibility testing on common isolates and no consistency was apparent between laboratories for any bacterial species.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that nationally agreed and consistent antimicrobial panels for routine susceptibility testing should be developed and a uniform set of guidelines should be adopted by veterinary diagnostic laboratories in Australia.

摘要

背景

应对抗菌药物耐药性的国家战略强调了兽医实践中抗菌药物管理以及对兽医病原体抗菌药物敏感性监测的必要性。诊断实验室在促进这两个过程中发挥着重要作用,但尚不清楚兽医诊断实验室的数据是否足够相似以便进行汇总,以及不同实验室的药敏试验方法中是否始终如一地推广了适当的抗菌药物使用。

方法

2017年通过在线问卷对澳大利亚兽医诊断实验室的抗菌药物敏感性试验和报告程序进行了横断面研究。澳大利亚所有18家兽医诊断实验室均完成了问卷。

结果

Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法是主要用于抗菌药物敏感性试验的方法,用于评估所有分离株的86%,尽管18家实验室使用了两种不同的方案(CLSI 15/18,CDS 3/18)。61%的实验室从未报告过最低抑菌浓度。除猪的革兰氏阴性分离株外,所有物种的常见分离株报告一致,猪的革兰氏阴性分离株的报告方法存在一些差异。用于常见分离株药敏试验的抗菌药物种类差异很大且各实验室间对任何细菌种类均无明显一致性。

结论

我们建议应制定全国统一且一致的用于常规药敏试验的抗菌药物种类,并由澳大利亚兽医诊断实验室采用一套统一的指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验