Newman D W, Kellett S, Beail N
Psychological Health Care, Off Broadway, Barnsley, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003 Jan;47(Pt 1):68-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00459.x.
Practice-based evidence represents the contribution of practitioners who utilize research methodologies to examine the quality of their clinical practice and service provision.
The present paper describes the evolution of a routine practice-based evidence system (PBES) via four phases of research and development. The four phases are described, as is their relevance to assessment and intervention with regard to the mental health problems of people with mild intellectual disability. Phase four describes the development of a routine PBES.
The PBES is capable of profiling the individual mental health needs of service users and examining service effectiveness and quality at an organizational level.
The PBES is discussed according to its current utility and possible directions for future development. The system is presented as an example of clinical governance that could be utilized by multidisciplinary teams to develop and maintain an organizational culture of quality.
基于实践的证据体现了从业者运用研究方法来审视其临床实践和服务提供质量所做出的贡献。
本文通过四个研发阶段描述了一个常规的基于实践的证据系统（PBES）的演变过程。阐述了这四个阶段以及它们与轻度智力残疾者心理健康问题的评估和干预的相关性。第四阶段描述了常规PBES的发展情况。
PBES能够描绘服务使用者的个体心理健康需求，并在组织层面审视服务效果和质量。
根据PBES当前的效用和未来可能的发展方向进行了讨论。该系统作为临床治理的一个范例呈现，多学科团队可利用它来发展和维持一种质量组织文化。
