Cotler S J, Layden J E, Neumann A U, Jensen D M
Section of Hepatology, RUSH-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J Viral Hepat. 2003 Jan;10(1):43-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00401.x.
A large proportion of patients fails to respond to treatment for hepatitis C. Initiation of interferon therapy is associated with a rapid first phase decline in viremia, reflecting inhibition of viral production or release from infected cells. We characterized first phase viral kinetics in previous nonresponder patients and compared the antiviral efficacy of interferon in nonresponders to that observed in naive patients. Twenty nonresponders with genotype 1 infection were evaluated. Ten received a single 15 mcg dose of interferon alfacon-1 and ten were given a 30 mcg dose. Viral kinetic data from previously untreated historical control patients with genotype 1 infection who received 9 mcg (n = 12) or 15 mcg (n = 13) of interferon alfacon-1 provided a basis for comparison. Antiviral efficacy was evaluated by calculating the reduction in HCV RNA levels during the first 24 h after interferon administration (log effectiveness). Hepatitis C virus levels decreased exponentially in previous nonresponder patients. Non-responders treated with 30 mcg of interferon alfacon-1 exhibited a greater log drop than non-responders receiving 15 mcg (P = 0.01). The log effectiveness of 15 mcg of interferon alfacon-1 in nonresponders was similar to 9 mcg in naives and was significantly < 15 mcg (P = 0.04) in naïve patients. The 30 mcg dose provided similar log effectiveness in nonresponders compared with 15 mcg in naive patients and exceeded the log effectiveness of 9 mcg in previously untreated patients (P = 0.035). Nonresponders who had greater than a 50% decrease in HCV RNA level from baseline at the end of previous treatment had a larger reduction in viral load at 24 h compared with those who had not achieved that level of response with prior therapy (P = 0.04). In conclusion, the log effectiveness of interferon was lower in nonresponders compared with treatment naive patients. The difference in antiviral effectiveness in previous nonresponders was overcome by higher interferon doses.
很大一部分丙型肝炎患者对治疗无反应。启动干扰素治疗与病毒血症的快速第一阶段下降相关,这反映了对病毒产生或从受感染细胞中释放的抑制作用。我们对先前无反应患者的第一阶段病毒动力学进行了特征分析,并比较了干扰素在无反应患者与初治患者中的抗病毒疗效。对20例基因1型感染的无反应患者进行了评估。其中10例接受了15微克单剂量的干扰素 alfacon-1,另外10例接受了30微克剂量。来自先前未治疗的基因1型感染的历史对照患者的数据,这些患者接受了9微克(n = 12)或15微克(n = 13)的干扰素 alfacon-1,为比较提供了基础。通过计算干扰素给药后最初24小时内HCV RNA水平的降低(对数有效性)来评估抗病毒疗效。在先前的无反应患者中,丙型肝炎病毒水平呈指数下降。接受30微克干扰素 alfacon-1治疗的无反应者的对数下降幅度大于接受15微克治疗的无反应者(P = 0.01)。15微克干扰素 alfacon-1在无反应者中的对数有效性与9微克在初治患者中的相似,且在初治患者中显著低于15微克(P = 0.04)。与初治患者中15微克相比,30微克剂量在无反应者中提供了相似的对数有效性,并且超过了先前未治疗患者中9微克的对数有效性(P = 0.035)。与那些先前治疗未达到该反应水平的患者相比,在先前治疗结束时HCV RNA水平从基线下降超过50%的无反应者在24小时时病毒载量下降更大(P = 0.04)。总之,与初治患者相比,干扰素在无反应者中的对数有效性较低。更高的干扰素剂量克服了先前无反应者在抗病毒有效性方面的差异。