Sjogren Maria H, Sjogren Robert, Holtzmuller Kent, Winston Bradley, Butterfield Betty, Drake Stanley, Watts Amber, Howard Robin, Smith Milton
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, and Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic, Falls Church, Virginia 22406, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Apr;50(4):727-32. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-2564-2.
Despite advances in the therapy of chronic hepatitis C, a large number of patients do not respond to current therapies. The study objective was to assess whether a combination of interferon (IFN) alfacon-1 and ribavirin improves the response rate compared with a combination of INF alpha-2b and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C subjects. The study was designed as an open-label, prospective, randomized, controlled study; 128 subjects with chronic hepatitis C were randomized to INF alfacon-1, 15 microg three times per week, plus ribavirin, 1 g/day, or IFN-alpha2b, 3 million units three times per week, plus ribavirin, 1 g/day for 48 weeks. The end point of the study was a sustained viral response, defined as undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks post 48 weeks of treatment. Overall, 57% of subjects in the INF alfacon-1/ribavirin group achieved a sustained antiviral response, compared with 40% of subjects in the IFN-alpha2b/ribavirin group (P = 0.052). In the subset of subjects with a high viral load, HCV RNA was successfully eradicated in more individuals who received INF alfacon-1/ribavirin than subjects who received IFN-alpha2b/ribavirin (57 versus 31%; P = 0.025). Among individuals with genotype 1 and a high viral load, the sustained antiviral response was significantly higher with INF alfacon-1/ribavirin than with IFN-alpha2b/ribavirin (46 versus 14%; P = 0.019). Adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the combination of INF alfacon-1 and ribavirin provides a significantly better treatment response compared with the combination of IFN-alpha2b and ribavirin in chronic HCV subjects infected with genotype 1 and a high viral RNA load.
尽管慢性丙型肝炎的治疗取得了进展,但仍有大量患者对当前疗法无反应。本研究的目的是评估与干扰素(IFN)α-2b联合利巴韦林相比,干扰素 alfacon-1 联合利巴韦林能否提高慢性丙型肝炎患者的应答率。本研究设计为开放标签、前瞻性、随机、对照研究;128 例慢性丙型肝炎患者被随机分为两组,一组接受干扰素 alfacon-1(15 微克,每周三次)联合利巴韦林(每日 1 克),另一组接受干扰素α-2b(300 万单位,每周三次)联合利巴韦林(每日 1 克),疗程为 48 周。研究的终点是持续病毒学应答,定义为治疗 48 周后 24 周时 HCV RNA 检测不到。总体而言,干扰素 alfacon-1/利巴韦林组 57%的患者实现了持续抗病毒应答,而干扰素α-2b/利巴韦林组为 40%(P = 0.052)。在高病毒载量的患者亚组中,接受干扰素 alfacon-1/利巴韦林治疗的患者中 HCV RNA 成功清除者多于接受干扰素α-2b/利巴韦林治疗的患者(57%对 31%;P = 0.025)。在基因型 1 且病毒载量高的个体中,干扰素 alfacon-1/利巴韦林的持续抗病毒应答显著高于干扰素α-2b/利巴韦林(46%对 14%;P = 0.019)。两个治疗组的不良事件相似。总之,本研究表明,对于感染基因型 1 且病毒 RNA 载量高的慢性丙型肝炎患者,干扰素 alfacon-1 联合利巴韦林的治疗应答明显优于干扰素α-2b 联合利巴韦林。