Pockros P J, Reindollar R, McHutchinson J, Reddy R, Wright T, Boyd D G, Wilkes L B
Department of Gastroenterology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
J Viral Hepat. 2003 Jan;10(1):55-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00402.x.
The treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients was enhanced when the combination of interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin was shown to be safe and more effective than interferon monotherapy. To date, no published reports have addressed the use of consensus interferon (CIFN) when combined with ribavirin. We conducted a pilot study to compare the safety and tolerability of daily CIFN plus ribavirin to CIFN monotherapy for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients. Forty subjects were randomized to two treatment groups; CIFN 9 microg daily, or CIFN 9 microg daily plus ribavirin 1000 or 1200 mg daily. All subjects received 48 weeks of therapy except for nongenotype 1 subjects in the combination treatment group who received only 24 weeks of therapy. The results show that at baseline, age, gender, risk factors, race, RNA titres, and liver histology were not different between the two groups. The proportion of subjects with genotype 1 infection was 50% (10/20) and 55% (11/20) for the monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively. Fifty (10/20) and sixty-five (13/20) per cent of subjects in the monotherapy and combination therapy groups exhibited a 2-log or greater decrease in viral titre at week 12 (P = NS). Using intent-to-treat analysis, 20% and 40% of enrolled subjects exhibited a sustained viral response in the monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively (P = NS). The proportion of subjects requiring dose reduction was 55% (11/20) and 65% (13/20), respectively. Study discontinuations for any reason were 25% (5/20) and 35% (7/20) for the monotherapy and combination groups, respectively. Discontinuations due to adverse events related to study drug were 20% (4/20) and 25% (5/20), respectively. A total of four serious adverse events occurred, two in each treatment group, only one of which was determined to be study-drug related. It is concluded that the safety and tolerability profiles of the two treatments were similar suggesting that daily dosing of CIFN may be difficult to tolerate resulting in discontinuation of therapy in a significant proportion of patients. The combination regimen resulted in a trend towards a higher viral response rate than monotherapy treatment. These data suggest that CIFN may be safely combined with ribavirin and may enhance the sustained response rate but is not well tolerated in US patients when given in a daily dosing regimen.
当干扰素α-2b与利巴韦林联合使用被证明安全且比单一干扰素疗法更有效时,慢性丙型肝炎患者的治疗得到了改善。迄今为止,尚无已发表的报告涉及共识干扰素(CIFN)与利巴韦林联合使用的情况。我们进行了一项初步研究,比较每日CIFN加利巴韦林与CIFN单一疗法用于慢性丙型肝炎患者初始治疗的安全性和耐受性。40名受试者被随机分为两个治疗组;一组为每日CIFN 9微克,另一组为每日CIFN 9微克加利巴韦林1000或1200毫克。除联合治疗组中的非1型基因型受试者仅接受24周治疗外,所有受试者均接受48周治疗。结果显示,在基线时,两组在年龄、性别、危险因素、种族、RNA滴度和肝脏组织学方面无差异。单一疗法组和联合疗法组中1型感染受试者的比例分别为50%(10/20)和55%(11/20)。单一疗法组和联合疗法组中分别有50%(10/20)和65%(13/20)的受试者在第12周时病毒滴度下降了2个对数或更多(P=无显著性差异)。采用意向性分析,单一疗法组和联合疗法组分别有20%和40%的入组受试者表现出持续病毒应答(P=无显著性差异)。需要减少剂量的受试者比例分别为55%(11/20)和65%(13/20)。单一疗法组和联合疗法组因任何原因停药的比例分别为25%(5/20)和35%(7/20)。因与研究药物相关的不良事件而停药的比例分别为20%(4/20)和25%(5/20)。总共发生了4起严重不良事件,每个治疗组各2起,其中只有1起被确定与研究药物相关。结论是,两种治疗方法的安全性和耐受性概况相似,这表明每日服用CIFN可能难以耐受,导致相当一部分患者中断治疗。联合用药方案导致病毒应答率有高于单一疗法的趋势。这些数据表明,CIFN与利巴韦林联合使用可能是安全的,并且可能提高持续应答率,但在美国患者中采用每日给药方案时耐受性不佳。