Charbonneau S, Scherzer B P, Aspirot D, Cohen H
Département de Psychologie and Centre de Neuroscience de la Cognition, Université du Québec à Montréal, PB 8888, Stn Centre-Ville, Montreal Que, Canada H3C 3P8.
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(5):605-13. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00202-6.
Variable etiology, limited testing of emotions and inclusion of patients in acute and chronic phases have made it difficult to specify the extent of right hemisphere involvement in the processing of emotional material. In addition, there is an absence of data concerning CVA patients' long-term abilities to process emotional information. Two groups of subjects with unilateral brain damage (15 RBD, 17 LBD), matched for chronicity (minimum 12 months post-CVA), etiology (ischemic CVA), duration of hospitalization and other variables, and an appropriate control group participated in two experiments to address these concerns. In the first experiment, subjects were given a series of tasks (discrimination, identification, imitation, production on request) to assess their processing of facial expressions of the six universal emotions [P. Ekman, W. Friesen, Unmasking the face, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1975]. The results showed that three emotions (surprise, happiness, fear) discriminate between RBD and LBD patients and controls, with RBD subjects performing worse than the other groups on the identification task only. Using tasks of the same nature, the second experiment investigated the processing of emotional prosody. The results showed that three emotions (fear, sadness, anger) discriminate between RBD and LBD patients and controls, with RBD subjects again performing worse than the others on the discrimination, imitation and production on request tasks. LBD subjects performed as well as normal controls on almost all tasks. The RBD subjects were the only ones who showed relatively consistent impairment in the processing of both facial and prosodic emotional information. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the right hemisphere is preferentially involved in processing emotional information in the chronic phase of brain damage.
病因多样、对情绪的测试有限以及纳入了急性期和慢性期的患者,这使得难以明确右半球在处理情感材料时的受累程度。此外,缺乏关于脑血管意外(CVA)患者处理情感信息的长期能力的数据。两组单侧脑损伤患者(15例右侧脑损伤,17例左侧脑损伤),在病程(CVA后至少12个月)、病因(缺血性CVA)、住院时间和其他变量方面进行了匹配,还有一个适当的对照组参与了两项实验以解决这些问题。在第一个实验中,受试者接受了一系列任务(辨别、识别、模仿、按要求生成),以评估他们对六种普遍情绪面部表情的处理能力[P. 埃克曼,W. 弗里森,《揭开面具》,普伦蒂斯 - 霍尔出版社,恩格尔伍德克利夫斯,1975年]。结果显示,三种情绪(惊讶、快乐、恐惧)能够区分右侧脑损伤和左侧脑损伤患者及对照组,右侧脑损伤受试者仅在识别任务上表现比其他组差。使用相同性质的任务,第二个实验研究了情感韵律的处理。结果显示,三种情绪(恐惧、悲伤、愤怒)能够区分右侧脑损伤和左侧脑损伤患者及对照组,右侧脑损伤受试者在辨别、模仿和按要求生成任务上再次表现比其他组差。左侧脑损伤受试者在几乎所有任务上的表现与正常对照组一样好。右侧脑损伤受试者是唯一在处理面部和韵律情感信息时都表现出相对一致损伤的人群。综合来看,这些数据强烈表明,在脑损伤的慢性期,右半球优先参与处理情感信息。