Suppr超能文献

使用功能磁共振成像和经颅磁刺激对表征图谱进行比较。

Comparison of representational maps using functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

作者信息

Lotze M, Kaethner R J, Erb M, Cohen L G, Grodd W, Topka H

机构信息

Institute for Medical Psychology and Behavioral Biology, University of Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;114(2):306-12. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00380-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) representational maps, that were generated during voluntary thumb abduction, hand dorsiflexion and foot elevation to amplitude maps of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) administered to cortical motor representation areas of the muscles of the thenar eminence, extensor carpi radialis and tibialis anterior muscles.

METHODS

Stimulus locations that produced maximal motor-evoked potential amplitudes were compared to fMRI activation maxima in three-dimensional (3D)-space and in a 2D-projection using a novel technique that allowed fMRI activation sites to be projected onto the surface of the brain.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

When analyzing pooled data from all target muscles, the location of projected fMRI and TMS activation maxima on the cortical surface differed by an average 13.9 mm. The differences in 3D distances were particularly large for representation areas of lower leg muscles. 3D distances between fMRI activation maxima and highest MEP site in TMS correlated significantly with higher TMS thresholds. These observations strongly suggest that higher TMS excitation thresholds and lower MEP amplitudes are largely due to the absolute distance between the stimulation site and the excitable cortical tissue targeting this muscle. After the projection 4 out of 5 representation sites as evaluated by TMS were located anterior to the fMRI activation maxima, an observation which may due to the orientation of the magnetic field induced by the current in the coil. The representation sites as evaluated with both methods were specific for the type of movement: distances between representation maxima of the same movements were significantly smaller than those within different movements. Nevertheless, fMRI and TMS provide complementary information, which is discussed on the basis of the functional map observed with both methods.

摘要

目的

比较功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)表征图,这些图是在自愿进行拇指外展、手背屈和足背屈时生成的,与通过对拇短展肌、桡侧腕伸肌和胫骨前肌的皮质运动代表区进行单次经颅磁刺激(TMS)所诱发的运动诱发电位(MEP)的幅度图进行比较。

方法

使用一种新技术,将产生最大运动诱发电位幅度的刺激位置与三维(3D)空间和二维投影中的fMRI激活最大值进行比较,该技术允许将fMRI激活位点投影到脑表面。

结果与结论

在分析来自所有目标肌肉的汇总数据时,皮质表面上投影的fMRI和TMS激活最大值的位置平均相差13.9毫米。小腿肌肉代表区的3D距离差异尤为显著。fMRI激活最大值与TMS中最高MEP位点之间的3D距离与较高的TMS阈值显著相关。这些观察结果强烈表明,较高的TMS兴奋阈值和较低的MEP幅度主要是由于刺激位点与靶向该肌肉的可兴奋皮质组织之间的绝对距离。在投影后,通过TMS评估的5个代表位点中有4个位于fMRI激活最大值之前,这一观察结果可能是由于线圈中电流感应的磁场方向所致。两种方法评估的代表位点对于运动类型具有特异性:相同运动的代表最大值之间的距离明显小于不同运动之间的距离。尽管如此,fMRI和TMS提供了互补信息,这将基于两种方法观察到的功能图进行讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验