Phillips Jane Ellen, Bogema Stuart, Fu Paul, Furmaga Wieslaw, Wu Alan H B, Zic Vlasta, Hammett-Stabler Catherine
University of North Carolina Hospitals, McLendon Clinical Labs, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
Clin Chim Acta. 2003 Feb;328(1-2):31-8. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00240-1.
Signify ER Drug Screen Test (Signify ER) and Triage Drug of Abuse Panel plus TCA (Triage DOA Panel) rapid drug screening devices were compared at four laboratories. Both assay systems are point of care immunoassays, measuring phencyclidine, barbiturates, amphetamine, cocaine metabolite, methamphetamine, tricyclic antidepressants, opiates, marijuana metabolite, and benzodiazepines in human urine. The performance of these two assay systems, including a cutoff verification and cross-reactivity using spiked urine specimens and accuracy using clinical urine samples, was investigated. The cutoff verification study showed that the Signify ER had 95.4% precision for all drugs tested at concentrations of 50%, 75%, 125%, 150%, and 200% of cutoffs compared to 90% precision obtained with Triage DOA Panel. Accuracy studies testing 53 negative urine samples demonstrated that both Signify ER and Triage DOA Panel have 100% specificity. Testing of 693 positive urine samples demonstrated that Signify ER and Triage DOA Panel have sensitivities of 99.8% and 99.3%, respectively, with an accuracy of 99.9% and 99.6%. A total of 527 compounds were tested for the cross-reactivity study. Eighty-seven structurally related drugs and metabolites were found to cross-react with at least one of the nine tests of the Signify ER. Four hundred forty structurally unrelated compounds that can be found in human urine were shown not to cross-react with the Signify ER. In terms of operating characteristics, the Signify ER device is simpler since only a single pipetting step is required, and reaction completed within 8 min.
在四个实验室对赛默飞世尔科技公司的急诊室药物筛查检测(赛默飞世尔科技公司急诊室检测)和滥用药物分诊检测板加三环类抗抑郁药检测(分诊滥用药物检测板)快速药物筛查设备进行了比较。这两种检测系统均为即时检验免疫分析法,用于检测人尿液中的苯环己哌啶、巴比妥类药物、苯丙胺、可卡因代谢物、甲基苯丙胺、三环类抗抑郁药、阿片类药物、大麻代谢物和苯二氮卓类药物。研究了这两种检测系统的性能,包括使用加标尿液样本进行的临界值验证和交叉反应性,以及使用临床尿液样本的准确性。临界值验证研究表明,与分诊滥用药物检测板90%的精密度相比,赛默飞世尔科技公司急诊室检测在临界值的50%、75%、125%、150%和200%浓度下对所有检测药物的精密度为95.4%。对53份阴性尿液样本进行的准确性研究表明,赛默飞世尔科技公司急诊室检测和分诊滥用药物检测板的特异性均为100%。对693份阳性尿液样本进行的检测表明,赛默飞世尔科技公司急诊室检测和分诊滥用药物检测板的灵敏度分别为99.8%和99.3%,准确性分别为99.9%和99.6%。共对527种化合物进行了交叉反应性研究。发现87种结构相关的药物和代谢物与赛默飞世尔科技公司急诊室检测的九项检测中的至少一项发生交叉反应。在人尿液中发现的440种结构不相关的化合物未显示与赛默飞世尔科技公司急诊室检测发生交叉反应。在操作特性方面,赛默飞世尔科技公司急诊室检测设备更简单,因为只需要一个移液步骤,并且反应在8分钟内完成。