Nolan Terry, Lee Min-Shi, Cordova Julie M, Cho Iksung, Walker Robert E, August Marilyn J, Larson Susan, Coelingh Kathleen L, Mendelman Paul M
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Vict, Australia.
Vaccine. 2003 Mar 7;21(11-12):1224-31. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00484-x.
This study was designed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent live-attenuated, cold-adapted influenza vaccine (CAIV-T) blended and filled at two different manufacturing facilities (Medeva and Aviron-PA). The vaccines contained approximately 10(7) TCID(50) (median tissue culture infectious dose) of each of the three recommended 1997-1998 influenza vaccine components, A/Shenzhen/227/95 (H1N1) (A/Bayern/7/95 (H1N1)-like strain), A/Wuhan/359/95 (H3N2), and B/Ann Arbor/1/94 (B/Beijing/184/93-like strain). Two hundred and twenty-five healthy Australian children aged 12-42 months were enrolled and randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive CAIV-T blended and filled either at Medeva or at Aviron-PA. Two doses of CAIV-T were given 4-6 weeks apart as an intranasal spray. Three blood specimens were collected (immediately before doses one and two, and 28 +/- 5 days following dose two) for measuring hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody responses. Adverse events occurring within 10 days and serious adverse events occurring within 42 days were collected. Serum HAI antibody levels were measured against the three vaccine strains. Equivalent immunogenicity between the two vaccine groups was pre-specified as: (1) within 20% difference in seroconversion rates (HAI titers > or =4-fold rise); and (2) within 4-fold difference in the 90% confidence interval of geometric mean titer ratio. Among 10 pre-specified adverse events, only vomiting had significantly different incidence rates in the two vaccine groups following dose one (3% versus 13%, P = 0.01) but the difference disappeared following dose two (4% versus 4%). Differences in seroconversion rates following dose two between the two vaccine groups in pre-vaccination seronegative children were all <20% for the three vaccine strains (16% for H1N1, 0% for H3N2, and 0% for B). The results indicate that CAIV-T blended and filled in the two facilities had equivalent profiles of safety and immunogenicity.
本研究旨在比较在两个不同生产设施(Medeva和Aviron-PA)混合灌装的三价减毒活疫苗、冷适应流感疫苗(CAIV-T)的安全性和免疫原性。这些疫苗含有三种1997 - 1998年推荐流感疫苗成分(A/深圳/227/95(H1N1)(A/拜仁/7/95(H1N1)样毒株)、A/武汉/359/95(H3N2)和B/安阿伯/1/94(B/北京/184/93样毒株))中每种成分约10(7) TCID(50)(半数组织培养感染剂量)。225名年龄在12至42个月的健康澳大利亚儿童被纳入研究,并按3:2的比例随机分组,分别接受在Medeva或Aviron-PA混合灌装的CAIV-T。通过鼻内喷雾给予两剂CAIV-T,间隔4 - 6周。采集三份血样(在第一剂和第二剂给药前即刻,以及第二剂给药后28±5天)以测量血凝抑制(HAI)抗体反应。收集10天内发生的不良事件和42天内发生的严重不良事件。针对三种疫苗毒株测量血清HAI抗体水平。两个疫苗组之间的等效免疫原性预先设定为:(1)血清转化率差异在20%以内(HAI滴度升高≥4倍);(2)几何平均滴度比的90%置信区间差异在4倍以内。在10种预先设定的不良事件中,仅在第一剂给药后,呕吐在两个疫苗组中的发生率有显著差异(3%对13%,P = 0.01),但在第二剂给药后差异消失(4%对4%)。对于三种疫苗毒株,在接种前血清阴性的儿童中,两个疫苗组在第二剂给药后的血清转化率差异均<20%(H1N1为16%,H3N2为0%,B为0%)。结果表明,在这两个设施中混合灌装的CAIV-T具有等效的安全性和免疫原性特征。