Piedra Pedro A, Gaglani Manjusha J, Riggs Mark, Herschler Gayla, Fewlass Charles, Watts Matt, Kozinetz Claudia, Hessel Colin, Glezen W Paul
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):e397-407. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2258.
Influenza-associated deaths in healthy children that were reported during the 2003-2004 influenza season heightened the public awareness of the seriousness of influenza in children. In 1996-1998, a pivotal phase III trial was conducted in children who were 15 to 71 months of age. Live attenuated influenza vaccine, trivalent (LAIV-T), was shown to be safe and efficacious. In a subsequent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LAIV-T trial in children who were 1 to 17 years of age, a statistically significant increase in asthma encounters was observed for children who were younger than 59 months. LAIV-T was not licensed to children who were younger than 5 years because of the concern for asthma. We report on the largest safety study to date of the recently licensed LAIV-T in children 18 months to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, and 10 to 18 years of age in a 4-year (1998-2002) community-based trial that was conducted at Scott & White Memorial Hospital and Clinic (Temple, TX).
An open-label, nonrandomized, community-based trial of LAIV-T was conducted before its licensure. Medical records of all children were surveyed for serious adverse events (SAEs) 6 weeks after vaccination. Health care utilization was evaluated by determining the relative risk (RR) of medically attended acute respiratory illness (MAARI) and asthma rates at 0 to 14 and 15 to 42 days after vaccination compared with the rates before vaccination. Medical charts of all visits coded as asthma were reviewed for appropriate classification of events: acute asthma or other. We evaluated the risk for MAARI (health care utilization for acute respiratory illness) 0 to 14 and 15 to 42 days after LAIV-T by a method similar to the postlicensure safety analysis conducted on measles, mumps, and rubella and on diphtheria, tetanus, and whole-cell pertussis vaccines.
All children regardless of age were administered a single intranasal dose of LAIV-T in each vaccine year. In the 4 years of the study, we administered 18780 doses of LAIV-T to 11096 children. A total of 4529, 7036, and 7215 doses of LAIV-T were administered to children who were 18 months to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, and 10 to 18 years of age, respectively. In vaccination years 1, 2, 3, and 4, we identified 10, 15, 11, and 6 SAEs, respectively. None of the SAEs was attributed to LAIV-T. In vaccination years 1, 2, 3, and 4, we identified 3, 2, 1, and 0 pregnancies, respectively, among adolescents. All delivered healthy infants. The RR for MAARI from 0 to 14 and 15 to 42 days after LAIV-T was assessed in vaccinees during the 4 vaccine years. Compared with the prevaccination period, there was no significant increase in risk in health care utilization attributed to MAARI from 0 to 14 and 15 to 42 days after vaccination in children who were 18 months to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, and 10 to 18 years of age in the 4 vaccine years. In children who were 18 months to 4 years of age, there was no significant increase in the risk in health care utilization for MAARI, MAARI subcategories (otitis media/sinusitis, upper respiratory tract illness, and lower respiratory tract illness), and asthma during the 0 to 14 days after vaccination compared with the prevaccination period. No significant increase in the risk in health care utilization for MAARI, MAARI subcategories, and asthma was detected when the risk period was extended to 15 to 42 days after vaccination, except for asthma events in vaccine year 1. A RR of 2.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-8.03) for asthma events was detected in children who were 18 months to 4 years of age but was not significantly increased for the other 3 vaccine years (vaccine year 2, RR: 1.42 [95% CI: 0.59-3.42]; vaccine year 3, RR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.12-1.83]; vaccine year 4, RR: 0.20 [95% CI: 0.03-1.54]). No significant increase in the risk in health care utilization for MAARI or asthma was observed in children who were 18 months to 18 years of age and received 1, 2, 3, or 4 annual sequential doses of LAIV-T. Children who were 18 months to 4 years of age and received 1, 2, 3, or 4 annual doses of LAIV-T did not experience a significant increase in the RR for MAARI 0 to 14 days after vaccination; this was also true for children who were 5 to 9 and 10 to 18 years of age.
We observed no increased risk for asthma events 0 to 14 days after vaccination in children who were 18 months to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, and 10 to 18 years of age, In vaccine year 1, children who were 18 months to 4 years of age did have a significantly higher RR (2.85; 95% CI: 1.01-8.03) for asthma events 15 to 42 days after vaccination. In vaccine year 2, the formulation of LAIV-T was identical to the vaccine formulation used in vaccine year 1; however, in children who were 18 months to 4 years of age, no statistically significant increased risk was detected for asthma events 15 to 42 days after vaccination. Similarly, in vaccine years 3 and 4, children who were 18 months to 4 years of age did not have a statistically significant increased risk for asthma events 15 to 42 days after vaccination. Also, LAIV-T did not increase the risk for asthma in children who received 1, 2, 3, or 4 annual doses of LAIV-T. Although the possibility for a true increased risk for asthma was observed in 1 of 4 years in children who were 18 months to 4 years at 15 to 42 days after vaccination, it is more likely that the association is a chance effect because of the 190 comparisons made without adjustment for multiple comparisons. We conclude that LAIV-T is safe in children who are 18 months to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, and 10 to 18 years of age. The hypothesis that LAIV-T is associated with an increase in asthma events in children who are younger than 5 years is not supported by our data. Reassessment of the lower age limit for use of LAIV-T in children is indicated.
2003 - 2004年流感季节报告的健康儿童流感相关死亡事件提高了公众对儿童流感严重性的认识。1996 - 1998年,在15至71个月大的儿童中进行了一项关键的III期试验。结果显示,三价减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV - T)安全有效。在随后一项针对1至17岁儿童的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的LAIV - T试验中,观察到59个月以下儿童哮喘就诊次数有统计学意义的增加。由于担心哮喘问题,LAIV - T未被批准用于5岁以下儿童。我们报告了在斯科特与怀特纪念医院及诊所(德克萨斯州坦普尔)进行的一项为期4年(1998 - 2002年)的社区试验中,对18个月至4岁、5至9岁和10至18岁儿童中最近获批的LAIV - T进行的迄今为止最大规模的安全性研究。
在LAIV - T获批前进行了一项开放标签、非随机的社区试验。在接种疫苗6周后,对所有儿童的医疗记录进行调查,以查找严重不良事件(SAE)。通过确定接种疫苗后0至14天和15至42天内就医治疗的急性呼吸道疾病(MAARI)的相对风险(RR)以及哮喘发生率,并与接种疫苗前的发生率进行比较,来评估医疗保健利用率。对所有编码为哮喘的就诊病历进行审查,以对事件进行适当分类:急性哮喘或其他。我们采用类似于对麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹疫苗以及白喉、破伤风和全细胞百日咳疫苗进行的获批后安全性分析的方法,评估LAIV - T接种后0至14天和从15至42天内MAARI的风险(急性呼吸道疾病的医疗保健利用率)。
在每个疫苗接种年度,所有年龄段的儿童均接受单剂量鼻内LAIV - T接种。在研究的4年中,我们为11096名儿童接种了18780剂LAIV - T。分别为18个月至4岁、5至9岁和10至18岁的儿童接种了4529剂、7036剂和7215剂LAIV - T。在第1、2、3和4个疫苗接种年度中,我们分别确定了10例、15例、11例和6例SAE。没有SAE归因于LAIV - T。在第1、2、3和4个疫苗接种年度中,我们分别在青少年中确定了3例、2例、1例和0例怀孕情况。所有孕妇均分娩了健康婴儿。在4个疫苗接种年度中,对接种LAIV - T后0至14天和15至42天内疫苗接种者的MAARI的RR进行了评估。与接种疫苗前相比,在4个疫苗接种年度中,18个月至4岁、5至9岁和10至18岁儿童接种疫苗后0至14天和15至42天内,因MAARI导致的医疗保健利用率风险没有显著增加。在18个月至4岁的儿童中,与接种疫苗前相比,接种疫苗后0至14天内MAARI、MAARI亚类(中耳炎/鼻窦炎、上呼吸道疾病和下呼吸道疾病)以及哮喘的医疗保健利用率风险没有显著增加。当风险期延长至接种疫苗后15至42天时,除了第1个疫苗接种年度的哮喘事件外,未检测到MAARI、MAARI亚类和哮喘的医疗保健利用率风险有显著增加。在18个月至4岁的儿童中检测到哮喘事件的RR为2.85(95%置信区间[CI]:1.01 - 8.03),但在其他3个疫苗接种年度中没有显著增加(第2个疫苗接种年度,RR:1.42[95%CI:0.59 - 3.42];第3个疫苗接种年度,RR:0.47[95%CI:0.12 - 1.83];第4个疫苗接种年度,RR:0.20[95%CI:0.03 - 1.54])。在18个月至18岁且接受1剂、2剂、3剂或4剂年度连续剂量LAIV - T的儿童中,未观察到MAARI或哮喘的医疗保健利用率风险有显著增加。18个月至4岁且接受1剂、2剂、3剂或4剂年度剂量LAIV - T的儿童在接种疫苗后0至14天内MAARI的RR没有显著增加;5至9岁和10至18岁的儿童也是如此。
我们观察到,在18个月至4岁、5至9岁和10至18岁的儿童中接种疫苗后第0至14天哮喘事件风险没有增加。在第1个疫苗接种年度,18个月至4岁的儿童在接种疫苗后15至42天哮喘事件的RR确实显著更高(2.85;95%CI:1.01 - 8.03)。在第2个疫苗接种年度,LAIV - T的配方与第1个疫苗接种年度使用的疫苗配方相同;然而,在18个月至4岁的儿童中,接种疫苗后15至42天未检测到哮喘事件的统计学显著增加风险。同样,在第3和第4个疫苗接种年度,18个月至4岁的儿童在接种疫苗后15至42天哮喘事件没有统计学显著增加风险。此外,LAIV - T在接受1剂、2剂、3剂或4剂年度剂量LAIV - T的儿童中没有增加哮喘风险。尽管在18个月至4岁的儿童接种疫苗后15至42天的4年中有1年观察到哮喘风险可能真正增加,但由于在未对多重比较进行调整的情况下进行了190次比较,这种关联更可能是偶然效应。我们得出结论,LAIV - T在18个月至4岁、5至9岁和10至18岁的儿童中是安全的。我们的数据不支持LAIV - T与5岁以下儿童哮喘事件增加有关的假设。建议重新评估LAIV - T在儿童中的较低使用年龄限制。