Schunicht Oliver C, Booker Calvin W, Guichon P Timothy, Jim G Kee, Wildman Brian K, Hill Bruce W, Ward Tracy I, Bauck Stewart W
Feedlot Health Management Services, Bay 7-87 Elizabeth Street, Postal Bag Service #5, Okotoks, Alberta T0L 1T0.
Can Vet J. 2002 Dec;43(12):940-5.
A field trial was performed under commercial feedlot conditions in western Canada to compare the efficacy of a new formulation of long-acting oxytetracycline (LA 30) to a standard long-acting oxytetracycline formulation (LA 20) and florfenicol (FLOR) for the treatment of undifferentiated fever (UF) in calves that received metaphylactic tilmicosin upon arrival at the feed-lot. Seven hundred and ninety-seven recently weaned, auction market derived, crossbred, beef calves suffering from UF were allocated to 1 of 3 experimental groups as follows: LA 30, which received intramuscular long-acting oxytetracycline (300 mg/mL formulation) at the rate of 30 mg/kg body weight (BW) at the time of allocation; LA 20, which received intramuscular long-acting oxytetracycline (200 mg/mL formulation) at the rate of 20 mg/kg BW at the time of allocation; or FLOR, which received intramuscular florfenicol administered at the rate of 20 mg/kg BW at the time of allocation and again 48 hours later. Two hundred and sixty-six animals were allocated to the LA 30 group, 265 animals were allocated to the LA 20 group, and 266 animals were allocated to the FLOR group. The relative efficacy of the LA 30 group, as compared with the LA 20 and FLOR groups, was assessed by comparing relapse, chronicity, wastage, and mortality rates. The overall mortality (RR = 0.50) rate in the LA 30 group was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in the LA 20 group. However, the overall chronicity (RR = 2.56) and overall wastage (RR = 6.97) rates of the LA 30 group were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in the LA 20 group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in UF relapse rates or cause specific mortality rates between the LA 30 and LA 20 groups. In the economic analysis, there was an advantage of $28.59 CDN per animal in the LA 30 group compared with the LA 20 group. The overall chronicity (RR = 2.25) and overall wastage (RR = 2.80) rates of the LA 30 group were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the FLOR group. There were no significant (P > or = 0.05) differences in UF relapse rates, overall mortality rates, or cause specific mortality rates between the LA 30 and FLOR groups. In the economic analysis, there was an advantage of $12.90 CDN per animal in the LA 30 group compared with the FLOR group. In summary, the results of this study indicate that it is more cost-effective to use a new formulation of long-acting oxytetracycline (300 mg/mL formulation administered at a rate of 30 mg/kg BW) than a standard long-acting oxytetracycline formulation (200 mg/mL formulation administered at a rate of 20 mg/kg BW) or florfenicol for the treatment of UF in feedlot calves that have previously received metaphylactic tilmicosin upon arrival at the feedlot.
在加拿大西部的商业饲养场条件下进行了一项田间试验,以比较一种新的长效土霉素制剂(LA 30)与标准长效土霉素制剂(LA 20)及氟苯尼考(FLOR)对到达饲养场时接受过预防性替米考星的犊牛未分化发热(UF)的治疗效果。797头最近断奶、来自拍卖市场的杂交肉用犊牛,患有未分化发热,被分配到以下3个实验组之一:LA 30组,在分配时按30 mg/kg体重(BW)的剂量肌肉注射长效土霉素(300 mg/mL制剂);LA 20组,在分配时按20 mg/kg BW的剂量肌肉注射长效土霉素(200 mg/mL制剂);或FLOR组,在分配时按20 mg/kg BW的剂量肌肉注射氟苯尼考,并在48小时后再次注射。266头动物被分配到LA 30组,265头动物被分配到LA 20组,266头动物被分配到FLOR组。通过比较复发率、慢性率、损耗率和死亡率,评估LA 30组与LA 20组及FLOR组相比的相对疗效。LA 30组的总体死亡率(RR = 0.50)显著(P < 0.05)低于LA 20组。然而,LA 30组的总体慢性率(RR = 2.56)和总体损耗率(RR = 6.97)显著(P < 0.05)高于LA 20组。LA 30组和LA 20组之间的未分化发热复发率或特定病因死亡率没有显著(P≥0.05)差异。在经济分析中,LA 30组每头动物比LA 20组有28.59加元的优势。LA 30组的总体慢性率(RR = 2.25)和总体损耗率(RR = 2.80)显著(P < 0.05)高于FLOR组。LA 30组和FLOR组之间的未分化发热复发率、总体死亡率或特定病因死亡率没有显著(P≥0.05)差异。在经济分析中,LA 30组每头动物比FLOR组有12.90加元的优势。总之,本研究结果表明,对于治疗到达饲养场时已接受预防性替米考星的饲养场犊牛的未分化发热,使用新的长效土霉素制剂(按30 mg/kg BW的剂量注射300 mg/mL制剂)比标准长效土霉素制剂(按20 mg/kg BW的剂量注射200 mg/mL制剂)或氟苯尼考更具成本效益。