Suppr超能文献

小细胞肺癌患者化疗时抗生素预防的经济学评估:一项欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的双盲安慰剂对照III期研究(08923)

Economic evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: an EORTC double-blind placebo-controlled phase III study (08923).

作者信息

Tjan-Heijnen V C G, Caleo S, Postmus P E, Ardizzoni A, Burghouts J T M, Buccholz E, Biesma B, Gorlia T, Crott R, Giaccone G, Debruyne C, Manegold C

机构信息

University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2003 Feb;14(2):248-57. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg073.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine whether the cost of prophylactic antibiotics during chemotherapy is offset by cost savings due to a decreased incidence of febrile leukopenia (FL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients were randomised to standard or intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to assess the impact on survival (n = 244). In addition, patients were randomised to prophylactic ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin or placebo to assess the impact on FL (n = 161). The economic evaluation examined the costs and effects of patients taking antibiotics versus placebo. Medical resource utilisation was documented prospectively, including 33 patients from one centre in The Netherlands (NL) and 49 patients from one centre in Germany (GE). The evaluation takes the perspective of the health insurance systems and of the hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In the main trial, prophylactic antibiotics reduced the incidence of FL, hospitalisation due to FL and use of therapeutic antibiotics by 50%. In GE, the incidence of FL was not reduced by prophylaxis. This resulted in an average cost difference of only 35 Euros [95% confidence interval (CI) (-)1.713-2.263] in favour of prophylaxis (not significant). In NL, prophylaxis reduced the incidence of FL by nearly 50%, comparable with the results of the main trial, resulting in a cost difference of 2706 Euros [95% CI 810-5948], demonstrating savings in favour of prophylactic antibiotics of nearly 45%. Sensitivity analyses indicate that with an efficacy of prophylaxis of 50%, and with expected costs of antibiotic prophylaxis of 500 Euros or less, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL; that is, a risk >10-20% for FL per cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Giving oral prophylactic antibiotics to SCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy is the dominant strategy in both GE and NL, demonstrating both cost-savings and superior efficacy. The sensitivity analyses demonstrate that, due to the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics and their low unit cost, cost savings will incur over a broad range of baseline risks for FL. We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients at risk for FL during chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

确定化疗期间预防性使用抗生素的成本是否会因发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FL)发病率降低带来的成本节省而得到抵消。

患者与方法

小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者被随机分配接受标准或强化化疗加粒细胞集落刺激因子,以评估对生存的影响(n = 244)。此外,患者被随机分配接受预防性环丙沙星和罗红霉素或安慰剂,以评估对FL的影响(n = 161)。经济评估考察了服用抗生素与安慰剂的患者的成本和效果。前瞻性记录医疗资源利用情况,包括来自荷兰(NL)一个中心的33名患者和来自德国(GE)一个中心的49名患者。评估采用医疗保险系统和医院的视角。进行了敏感性分析。

结果

在主要试验中,预防性使用抗生素使FL的发病率、因FL住院率和治疗性抗生素的使用减少了50%。在GE,预防性用药未降低FL的发病率。这导致预防性用药的平均成本差异仅为35欧元[95%置信区间(CI)(-)1713 - 2263],预防性用药更具优势(无统计学意义)。在NL,预防性用药使FL的发病率降低了近50%,与主要试验结果相当,成本差异为2706欧元[95% CI 810 - 5948],表明预防性使用抗生素节省了近45%的成本。敏感性分析表明,预防性用药有效率为50%,且预防性使用抗生素的预期成本为500欧元或更低时,在FL的广泛基线风险范围内都会产生成本节省;即每个周期FL的风险>10 - 20%。

结论

对接受化疗的SCLC患者给予口服预防性抗生素在GE和NL都是主要策略,可以节省成本且疗效更佳。敏感性分析表明,由于预防性抗生素的疗效及其单位成本较低,在FL的广泛基线风险范围内都会产生成本节省。我们建议对化疗期间有FL风险的患者使用预防性抗生素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验