Ivanov Andrei I, Kulchitsky Vladimir A, Romanovsky Andrej A
Trauma Research, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA.
J Physiol. 2003 Mar 15;547(Pt 3):941-9. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.033183. Epub 2003 Jan 31.
The involvement of the cholecystokinin (CCK)-A receptor in fever was studied. The polyphasic febrile responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 10 microg kg-1, I.V.) were compared between wild-type Long-Evans (LE) rats and the CCK-A-receptor-deficient Otsuka LE Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats. The response of the wild-type rats was biphasic, which is typical for LE rats. Phases 1 and 2 of the response of the OLETF rats were similar to those of the LE rats, but the OLETF rats also developed a robust phase 3. This late enhancement of the febrile response could reflect either the absence of the A receptor per se or a secondary trait of the mutant strain. To distinguish between these possibilities, we conducted a pharmacological analysis. We studied whether the normally low phase 3 of LE rats can be enhanced by a CCK-A-receptor antagonist, sodium lorglumide (4.3 microg kg-1 min-1, 120 min, I.V.), and whether the normally high phase 3 of Wistar rats can be attenuated by a CCK-A receptor agonist, sulphated CCK-8 (up to 0.17 microg kg-1 min-1, 120 min, I.V.). The dose of sodium lorglumide used was sufficient to increase food intake (to block satiety), but it did not affect the fever response. In both febrile and afebrile rats, CCK-8 induced dose-dependent skin vasodilatation and decreased body temperature, but it failed to produce any effects specific for phase 3. We conclude that the exaggeration of phase 3 in OLETF rats reflects a secondary trait of this strain and not the lack of the CCK-A receptor per se. None of the three known phases of the febrile response of rats to LPS requires the CCK-A receptor.
研究了胆囊收缩素(CCK)-A受体在发热中的作用。比较了野生型Long-Evans(LE)大鼠和CCK-A受体缺陷型大冢LE德岛肥胖(OLETF)大鼠对脂多糖(LPS;10微克/千克,静脉注射)的多相发热反应。野生型大鼠的反应是双相的,这是LE大鼠的典型反应。OLETF大鼠反应的第1和第2阶段与LE大鼠相似,但OLETF大鼠还出现了强烈的第3阶段。发热反应的这种晚期增强可能反映了A受体本身的缺失或突变株的次要特征。为了区分这些可能性,我们进行了药理学分析。我们研究了CCK-A受体拮抗剂洛谷胺钠(4.3微克/千克·分钟,120分钟,静脉注射)是否能增强LE大鼠通常较低的第3阶段,以及CCK-A受体激动剂硫酸化CCK-8(高达0.17微克/千克·分钟,120分钟,静脉注射)是否能减弱Wistar大鼠通常较高的第3阶段。所用洛谷胺钠的剂量足以增加食物摄入量(阻断饱腹感),但不影响发热反应。在发热和不发热的大鼠中,CCK-8均诱导剂量依赖性皮肤血管舒张并降低体温,但对第3阶段未产生任何特异性影响。我们得出结论,OLETF大鼠第3阶段的夸大反映了该品系的次要特征,而非CCK-A受体本身的缺乏。大鼠对LPS发热反应的三个已知阶段均不需要CCK-A受体。