Glickman M G, Handel S F, Hoff J T, Coulson W
Neuroradiology. 1976;10(4):187-95. doi: 10.1007/BF00329995.
Review of cerebral arteriograms of all our patients [19] with epidural hematoma over a 2 year period revealed evidence of localized extrinsic compression of the cerebral cortex in all cases. This finding, although not as specific as those previously described for epidural hematoma, was strongly suggestive. A 2 year prospective study was then initiated employing internal, rather than common carotid arteriography, because opacification of the external carotid artery is not necessary for evaluation of cortical compression. In this study, which consisted of 21 patients, epidural hematoma was correctly diagnosed in all, relying primarily on signs of localized extrinisic cerebral cortical compression. No epidural hematoma was misinterpreted as being a subdural hematoma or an intracerebral injury, and all epidural hematomas that were present were diagnosed correctly. We conclude that internal carotid arteriography is a sensitive method for diagnosing epidural hematoma. The signs of extrinsic cortical compression should be emphasized in the interpretation of arteriograms of patients with head injuries whether the internal or the common carotid artery is injected.
回顾我们所有硬膜外血肿患者在两年期间的脑动脉造影[19]发现,所有病例均有大脑皮质局限性外部压迫的证据。这一发现虽然不像先前描述的硬膜外血肿那样具有特异性,但具有强烈的提示性。随后开展了一项为期两年的前瞻性研究,采用颈内动脉造影而非颈总动脉造影,因为评估皮质压迫不需要颈外动脉显影。在这项由21例患者组成的研究中,所有患者均正确诊断为硬膜外血肿,主要依据局限性外部大脑皮质压迫的体征。没有将硬膜外血肿误诊为硬膜下血肿或脑内损伤,所有存在的硬膜外血肿均被正确诊断。我们得出结论,颈内动脉造影是诊断硬膜外血肿的一种敏感方法。在解释头部受伤患者的动脉造影时,无论注入的是颈内动脉还是颈总动脉,都应强调外部皮质压迫的体征。