• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期研究外部影响对警方使用致命武力的作用。

Examining the impact of external influences on police use of deadly force over time.

作者信息

White Michael D

机构信息

University of North Florida, USA.

出版信息

Eval Rev. 2003 Feb;27(1):50-78. doi: 10.1177/0193841X02239018.

DOI:10.1177/0193841X02239018
PMID:12568060
Abstract

Prior deadly force research has sought to identify appropriate mechanisms that can effectively control police officers' decisions to use deadly force. However, the relative impact of external discretion control policies on police shooting behavior remains largely unknown. Using data from Philadelphia for a period of more than two decades, this article employs interrupted time-series analysis (ARIMA) to examine the impact of legislation and judicial intervention on use of deadly force by Philadelphia police officers. The article also considers the impact of larger, community-level characteristics on levels of deadly force. Findings produced modest support for the potential effect of external discretion control policies and community-level factors on police shooting behavior but generally suggest that dynamic changes in the internal working environment can outweigh the influence of the external mechanisms.

摘要

先前关于致命武力的研究试图确定能够有效控制警察使用致命武力决策的适当机制。然而,外部自由裁量权控制政策对警察枪击行为的相对影响在很大程度上仍不为人知。本文利用费城二十多年的数据,采用中断时间序列分析(自回归积分滑动平均模型)来检验立法和司法干预对费城警察使用致命武力的影响。本文还考虑了更大范围的社区层面特征对致命武力水平的影响。研究结果对外部自由裁量权控制政策和社区层面因素对警察枪击行为的潜在影响提供了一定支持,但总体表明内部工作环境的动态变化可能超过外部机制的影响。

相似文献

1
Examining the impact of external influences on police use of deadly force over time.长期研究外部影响对警方使用致命武力的作用。
Eval Rev. 2003 Feb;27(1):50-78. doi: 10.1177/0193841X02239018.
2
Assessing the impact of administrative policy on use of deadly force by on- and off-duty police.评估行政政策对在职和休班警察使用致命武力的影响。
Eval Rev. 2000 Jun;24(3):295-318. doi: 10.1177/0193841X0002400303.
3
Domestic violence and firearms: reflections of a prosecutor.家庭暴力与枪支:一名检察官的思考
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):237-44. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287818.
4
Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide?限制家庭暴力罪犯获取枪支的法律能否预防亲密伴侣杀人案?
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):313-46. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287307.
5
The production of criminal violence in America: is strict gun control the solution?美国犯罪暴力的产生:严格的枪支管制是解决办法吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Spring;32(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00447.x.
6
Policing guns and youth violence.管控枪支与青少年暴力。
Future Child. 2002 Summer-Fall;12(2):132-51.
7
Separating batterers and guns: a review and analysis of gun removal laws in 50 States.将施暴者与枪支分离:对50个州枪支收缴法律的回顾与分析
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):296-312. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287680.
8
Violence in America: a public health crisis--The role of firearms. The Violence Prevention Task Force of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.美国的暴力:一场公共卫生危机——枪支的作用。东部创伤外科学会暴力预防特别工作组
J Trauma. 1995 Feb;38(2):163-8.
9
Effects of state-level policy changes on homicide and nonfatal shootings of law enforcement officers.州级政策变化对执法人员凶杀案及非致命枪击事件的影响。
Inj Prev. 2016 Aug;22(4):274-8. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041825. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
10
Bracing for the impact of expanded Second Amendment rights.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):506-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006890. Epub 2010 Jun 30.