Bauer Wolfgang Rudolf, Ertl Georg
Medizinische Klinik der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Wūrburg, Germany.
Herz. 2002 Dec;27(8):740-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-002-2424-1.
The effect of mechanical on electrical remodeling or electrical instability of the heart shows that it is essential for the prevention of sudden death to avoid or delay mechanical remodeling and neurohumoral activation after myocardial infarction. In other words, patients after myocardial infarction prone to neurohumoral activation need to be treated with ACE inhibitors or perhaps AT1-receptor blockers and beta blockers to maintain electrical stability.
MADIT I and MUSTT study showed that patients with severe ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction are at high risk of sudden death, especially in presence of electrical instabilities indicated by ventricular arrhythmias. These patients certainly need an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). It is not clear so far whether or not the indication needs to be extended according to the MADIT II study. In other words, need all postmyocardial infarction patients with reduced pump function an ICD? There is no doubt that many patients with an ejection fraction below 30% have ventricular arrhythmias and fulfil therefore the inclusion criteria for the MADIT I or MUSTT study. In MADIT I, a run of three ventricular premature beats force was sufficient to fulfil the inclusion criteria.
Another important consequence of the temporal correlation between mechanical and electrical remodeling is that specific attention must be directed to these interrelations in patients after myocardial infarction. Patients who die of sudden death show in comparison to surviving patients a substantial dilatation of the left ventricular during 6 months of observation which parallel the increasing incidence of ventricular premature beats. The consequence for therapy would be that in patients who present with left ventricular dilatation during 6 months after myocardial infarction, electrical instability is present and a high risk of sudden death exists. These patients probably will benefit from an ICD.
机械因素对心脏电重构或电不稳定的影响表明,避免或延缓心肌梗死后的机械重构和神经体液激活对于预防猝死至关重要。换句话说,心肌梗死后易于发生神经体液激活的患者需要使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或可能使用血管紧张素Ⅱ1型受体阻滞剂及β受体阻滞剂进行治疗,以维持电稳定性。
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)适应证:MADITⅠ和MUSTT研究表明,心肌梗死后严重心室功能障碍的患者猝死风险很高,尤其是存在室性心律失常所提示的电不稳定时。这些患者肯定需要植入式自动心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。目前尚不清楚根据MADITⅡ研究,该适应证是否需要扩大。换句话说,所有心肌梗死后泵功能降低的患者都需要ICD吗?毫无疑问,许多射血分数低于30%的患者都有室性心律失常,因此符合MADITⅠ或MUSTT研究的纳入标准。在MADITⅠ研究中,连续3次室性早搏即可满足纳入标准。
机械重构与电重构之间时间相关性的另一个重要结果是,必须特别关注心肌梗死后患者的这些相互关系。与存活患者相比,死于猝死的患者在6个月的观察期内左心室明显扩张,这与室性早搏发生率增加相平行。治疗的意义在于,在心肌梗死后6个月内出现左心室扩张的患者中,存在电不稳定且猝死风险很高。这些患者可能会从ICD中获益。