• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Incubation time in sterility tests for pharmaceutical products.

作者信息

Bugno A, Pinto T de Jesus Andreoli

机构信息

Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Boll Chim Farm. 2002 Nov-Dec;141(6):453-6.

PMID:12577516
Abstract

Throughout the evolution of sterility test methodology, different periods of incubation were adopted depending on both the type of microorganism to be detected and the employed inoculation methodology. Some official compendiums, such as Brazilian and Mexican pharmacopoeias, recommend different incubation periods, according to the inoculation methodology employed for the sterility test, whereas the United States Pharmacopeia, in its last edition, started to adopt an incubation period of 14 days, independently from the methodology employed. The aim of this work was the evaluation of the influence of the incubation time on the efficiency of different methodologies for sterility test, as well as the benefits that could be achieved with the incubation time extension. The experiments led to the conclusion that an incubation period of 14 days is enough for the detection of microbiological contaminants in pharmaceutical products submitted to sterility tests, independently from the methodology employed, what values the alteration introduced in the USP XXIV, to the detriment of other pharmacopoeias which maintain different periods of time in accordance with the inoculation method employed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Incubation time in sterility tests for pharmaceutical products.
Boll Chim Farm. 2002 Nov-Dec;141(6):453-6.
2
Comparative study between culture media employed in sterility test.无菌检查中所用培养基的比较研究。
Boll Chim Farm. 2002 Sep-Oct;141(5):367-71.
3
Evaluation of growth based rapid microbiological methods for sterility testing of vaccines and other biological products.疫苗和其他生物制品无菌检查用基于生长的快速微生物检测方法评估。
Vaccine. 2011 Oct 19;29(45):8012-23. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.055. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
4
Optimal incubation conditions for sterility tests.无菌试验的最佳培养条件。
Dev Biol Stand. 1974;23:94-102.
5
Evaluation of the sterility test for detection of microbial contaminants of allografts.异体移植物微生物污染物检测的无菌试验评估。
Cell Tissue Bank. 2006;7(1):23-8. doi: 10.1007/s10561-005-3393-4.
6
Comparison of automated culture systems with a CFR/USP-compliant method for sterility testing of cell-therapy products.自动培养系统与符合CFR/USP标准的细胞治疗产品无菌检测方法的比较。
Cytotherapy. 2004;6(3):183-95. doi: 10.1080/14653240410005997.
7
The incubation period in sterility testing.
J Parenter Sci Technol. 1993 Sep-Oct;47(5):254-7.
8
[Optimizing microbiological controls of corneal organ culture media].[优化角膜器官培养基的微生物控制]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Oct;26(8):792-800.
9
Panel discussion: proposed changes in the USP--microbiological aspects. I. Proposed changes in the USP sterility test.小组讨论:美国药典(USP)的拟议变更——微生物学方面。一、USP无菌检查法的拟议变更。
Bull Parenter Drug Assoc. 1969 Nov-Dec;23(6):252-4.
10
Roadmap to approval: use of an automated sterility test method as a lot release test for Carticel, autologous cultured chondrocytes.批准路线图:使用自动化无菌测试方法作为自体培养软骨细胞Carticel的批放行测试。
Cytotherapy. 2005;7(6):531-41. doi: 10.1080/14653240500361079.