• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial: study design and rationale.

作者信息

Ornato Joseph P, McBurnie Mary Ann, Nichol Graham, Salive Marcel, Weisfeldt Myron, Riegel Barbara, Christenson James, Terndrup Thomas, Daya Mohamud

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Center, 401 North 12th Street, Box 525, Room G-248, Richmond, VA 23298-0525, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2003 Feb;56(2):135-47. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00442-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00442-2
PMID:12589986
Abstract

The PAD Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical study testing whether volunteer, non-medical responders can improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOH-CA) by using automated external defibrillators (AEDs). These lay volunteers, who have no traditional responsibility to respond to a medical emergency as part of their primary job description, will form part of a comprehensive, integrated community approach to the treatment of OOH-CA. The study is being conducted at 24 field centers in the United States and Canada. Approximately 1000 community units (e.g. apartment or office buildings, gated communities, sports facilities, senior centers, shopping malls, etc.) were randomized to treatment by trained laypersons who will provide either cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) alone or CPR plus use of an AED, while awaiting arrival of the community's emergency medical services responders. The primary endpoint is the number of OOH-CA victims who survive to hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints include neurological status, health-related quality of life (HRQL), cost, and cost-effectiveness. Data collection will last approximately 15 months and is expected to be completed in September 2003.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial: study design and rationale.
Resuscitation. 2003 Feb;56(2):135-47. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00442-2.
2
Automated external defibrillator program does not impair cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation in the public access defibrillation trial.在公众可获取除颤试验中,自动体外除颤器程序不会影响心肺复苏的启动。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jun;13(6):659-65. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.01.024. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
3
Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后的公众可及除颤与生存率
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 12;351(7):637-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040566.
4
Measuring survival rates from sudden cardiac arrest: the elusive definition.测量心脏骤停的存活率:难以捉摸的定义。
Resuscitation. 2004 Jul;62(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.02.007.
5
Characteristics of volunteers responding to emergencies in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial.公众可获取除颤试验中应对紧急情况的志愿者特征。
Resuscitation. 2007 Feb;72(2):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.06.036. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
6
Cost-effectiveness of lay responder defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时非专业急救人员除颤的成本效益
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;54(2):226-35.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.021. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
7
Adverse events associated with lay emergency response programs: the public access defibrillation trial experience.与非专业急救响应计划相关的不良事件:公众可获取除颤试验经验
Resuscitation. 2006 Jul;70(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.030.
8
AED use in businesses, public facilities and homes by minimally trained first responders.经过最低限度培训的急救人员在企业、公共设施和家庭中使用自动体外除颤器。
Resuscitation. 2003 Nov;59(2):225-33. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00214-4.
9
Public defibrillation: increased survival from a structured response system.公众除颤:结构化响应系统提高生存率
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):384-9. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200411000-00009.
10
New approaches to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停的新方法。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2006 Jan;73(1):440-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.一种理解医学研究中信任与不信任的范式:社区声音研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):39-47. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1432718. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Knowledge and attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation amongst Asian primary health care physicians.亚洲基层医疗保健医生对心肺复苏和除颤的认知与态度
Open Access Emerg Med. 2009 Nov 16;1:11-20. doi: 10.2147/oaem.s6721. eCollection 2009.
3
Review and Outcome of Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
长时间心肺复苏的回顾与结果
Crit Care Res Pract. 2016;2016:7384649. doi: 10.1155/2016/7384649. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
4
Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死诊断与治疗的最新进展
World J Cardiol. 2015 May 26;7(5):243-76. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i5.243.
5
Two simple questions to assess neurologic outcomes at 3 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: experience from the public access defibrillation trial.两个用于评估院外心脏骤停后3个月神经学转归的简单问题:来自公众可获取除颤试验的经验
Resuscitation. 2010 May;81(5):530-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.011. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
6
The effect of time on CPR and automated external defibrillator skills in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial.在公众可获取除颤试验中时间对心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤技能的影响。
Resuscitation. 2007 Jul;74(1):52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.11.005. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
7
Social and demographic predictors of no transport prior to premature cardiac death: United States 1999-2000.心脏性猝死前未接受转运的社会和人口统计学预测因素:美国,1999 - 2000年
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006 Nov 15;6:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-6-45.
8
Clinical review: Devices and drugs for cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- opportunities and restraints.临床综述:用于心肺复苏的设备与药物——机遇与限制
Crit Care. 2005 Jun;9(3):287-90. doi: 10.1186/cc2960. Epub 2004 Sep 27.