Mishra Ravi Shankar, Bose Sharmila, Gu Yaping, Li Ruliang, Singh Neena
The Institute of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, 2085, Adelbert Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2003 Feb;5(1):15-23. doi: 10.3233/jad-2003-5103.
Although familial prion disorders are a direct consequence of mutations in the prion protein gene, the underlying mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration remain unclear. Potential pathogenic mechanisms include abnormal cellular metabolism of the mutant prion protein (PrP(M)), or destabilization of PrP(M) structure inducing a change in its conformation to the pathogenic PrP-scrapie (PrP(Sc)) form. To further clarify these mechanisms, we investigated the biogenesis of mutant PrP V203I and E211Q associated with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and PrP Q212P associated with Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome in neuroblastoma cells. We report that all three PrP(M) forms accumulate similarly in the cytosol in response to proteasomal inhibition, and finally assemble as classical aggresomes. Since the three PrP(M) forms tested in this report are distinct, we propose that sequestration of misfolded PrP(M) into aggresomes is likely a general response of the cellular quality control that is not specific to a particular mutation in PrP. Moreover, since PrP has the remarkable ability to refold into PrP(Sc) that can subsequently replicate, PrP(M) sequestered in aggresomes may cause neurotoxicity by both direct and indirect pathways; directly through PrP(Sc) aggregates, and indirectly by depleting normal PrP, through induction of a cellular stress response, or by other undefined pathways. On the other hand, sequestered PrP(M) may be relatively inert, and cellular toxicity may be mediated by early intermediates in aggresome formation. Taken together, these observations demonstrate the role of proteasomes in the pathogenesis of familial prion disorders, and argue for further explanation of its mechanistic details.
尽管家族性朊病毒病是朊病毒蛋白基因突变的直接后果,但导致神经退行性变的潜在机制仍不清楚。潜在的致病机制包括突变型朊病毒蛋白(PrP(M))的细胞代谢异常,或PrP(M)结构的不稳定导致其构象转变为致病性的瘙痒病朊病毒(PrP(Sc))形式。为了进一步阐明这些机制,我们研究了与克雅氏病相关的突变型PrP V203I和E211Q,以及与格斯特曼-施特劳斯勒-谢inker综合征相关的PrP Q212P在神经母细胞瘤细胞中的生物发生。我们报告,在蛋白酶体抑制的情况下,所有三种PrP(M)形式在细胞质中积累情况相似,最终组装成典型的聚集体。由于本报告中测试的三种PrP(M)形式各不相同,我们提出将错误折叠的PrP(M)隔离到聚集体中可能是细胞质量控制的一种普遍反应,并非特定于PrP中的某个特定突变。此外,由于PrP具有显著的重新折叠成随后可复制的PrP(Sc)的能力,隔离在聚集体中的PrP(M)可能通过直接和间接途径导致神经毒性;直接通过PrP(Sc)聚集体,间接通过消耗正常PrP、诱导细胞应激反应或其他未定义的途径。另一方面,隔离的PrP(M)可能相对无活性,细胞毒性可能由聚集体形成过程中的早期中间体介导。综上所述,这些观察结果证明了蛋白酶体在家族性朊病毒病发病机制中的作用,并主张进一步解释其机制细节。