Suppr超能文献

使用电子束断层扫描检测不同层厚下小冠状动脉钙化病变的敏感性。

Sensitivity to detect small coronary artery calcium lesions with varying slice thickness using electron beam tomography.

作者信息

Mao Songshou, Child Janis, Carson Sivi, Liu Steve C K, Oudiz Ronald J, Budoff Matthew J

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute, Torrance, California. dagger From the Department of Radiology, XiJing Hospital, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Invest Radiol. 2003 Mar;38(3):183-7. doi: 10.1097/01.RLI.0000055289.97726.B1.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

To estimate the sensitivity to find small coronary artery calcium lesions with use of different slice widths with electron beam tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two studies were performed. Study 1 utilized double scanning of a stationary cork phantom with three different slice thickness (1.5, 3, and 6 mm). Fifty different calcific lesions (all <20 mm2 in area) fitted in 10 cork coronary arteries were utilized. The calcium foci area, peak value and score were measured and compared. In group 2, 30 patients underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) screen studies. Each patient was scanned with both 3-mm and 6-mm scan widths in a same study time. Lesions with < 20 mm2 of area of CAC were measured on both 3-mm and 6-mm images. The mean and peak Hounsfield unit measure, and Agatston score were compared between both images.

RESULTS

In the cork study, the sensitivity to detect small calcium foci were 96% (48/50), 82% (41/50), and 34% (17/50) in images with 1.5-, 3-, and 6-mm slice thickness, respectively. There is a smaller value in mass, and calcium volume in 6-mm images than 1.5-mm and 3-mm images ( P< 0.001). There was no significant difference between the true value and measured value from 1.5-mm and 3-mm images. In the human study, 18 (30%) of 60 CAC lesions with an area < 20 mm2 defined on 3 mm images were not visible on 6-mm images. Sensitivity of small lesions (P< 5 mm2) was 48% using 6-mm slices. There was a smaller value in CAC area, mean and peak Hounsfield units and score measured from 6-mm images, as compared with 3 mm slices ( P< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Thinner slice imaging has a higher sensitivity to detect small calcium focus. There was no significant change in score between 3 mm and 1.5 mm on the cork phantom study. However, the use of 6-mm slices should be discouraged, as this protocol both underestimates calcific mass and misses a significant number of calcific lesions in both a phantom and human study.

摘要

原理与目的

评估使用电子束断层扫描不同层厚检测小冠状动脉钙化病变的敏感性。

材料与方法

进行了两项研究。研究1对一个固定的软木模型进行了两次扫描,层厚分别为1.5、3和6毫米。使用了10个软木冠状动脉中的50个不同钙化病变(面积均<20平方毫米)。测量并比较了钙化灶面积、峰值和评分。在研究2中,30例患者接受了冠状动脉钙化(CAC)筛查研究。在同一研究时间内,对每位患者分别进行3毫米和6毫米扫描宽度的扫描。在3毫米和6毫米图像上测量面积<20平方毫米的CAC病变。比较了两幅图像上的平均和峰值亨氏单位测量值以及阿加斯顿评分。

结果

在软木模型研究中,层厚为1.5、3和6毫米的图像检测小钙化灶的敏感性分别为96%(48/50)、82%(41/50)和34%(17/50)。6毫米图像中的质量和钙体积值小于1.5毫米和3毫米图像(P<0.001)。1.5毫米和3毫米图像的真值与测量值之间无显著差异。在人体研究中,3毫米图像上定义的60个面积<20平方毫米的CAC病变中有18个(30%)在6毫米图像上不可见。使用6毫米层厚时,小病变(P<5平方毫米)的敏感性为48%。与3毫米层厚相比,6毫米图像上测量的CAC面积、平均和峰值亨氏单位以及评分值较小(P<0.05)。

结论

薄层成像检测小钙化灶的敏感性更高。在软木模型研究中,3毫米和1.5毫米之间的评分无显著变化。然而,应避免使用6毫米层厚,因为在模型和人体研究中,该方案既低估了钙化质量,又遗漏了大量钙化病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验