Rubin Ronnie M, Hubbard Julie A
University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2003 Feb;31(1):65-78. doi: 10.1023/a:1021773316251.
The first goal of this study was to investigate sociometric status, aggression, and gender differences in children's verbalizations and cheating behavior during game playing using a fine-grained observational coding system. The second goal was to control for the effects of differential peer treatment and bias on children's behavior by observing children in a standardized procedure with unfamiliar peer confederates. Participants were 111 second-grade African American children, half average and half rejected sociometric status, half aggressive and half nonaggressive based on peer nominations, and half boys and half girls. Rejected children engaged in more cheating behavior and made more negative and argumentative verbalizations than average status children. Boys made more negative and argumentative verbalizations than girls. Aggressive children did not differ from nonaggressive children, in terms of either verbalizations or cheating behavior.
本研究的首要目标是,运用精细的观察编码系统,调查儿童在游戏过程中的社交测量地位、攻击性以及言语表达和作弊行为方面的性别差异。第二个目标是,通过在标准化程序中观察儿童与不熟悉的同伴同盟的互动,来控制同伴差异对待和偏见对儿童行为的影响。研究参与者为111名二年级非裔美国儿童,根据社交测量地位,一半为普通儿童,一半为被拒斥儿童;根据同伴提名,一半具有攻击性,一半没有攻击性;一半为男孩,一半为女孩。被拒斥儿童比普通地位儿童有更多的作弊行为,并且有更多消极和爱争论的言语表达。男孩比女孩有更多消极和爱争论的言语表达。在言语表达或作弊行为方面,有攻击性的儿童与没有攻击性的儿童没有差异。