由于攻击性行为的情境和类型不同，儿童在同伴社会测量和归因评分上存在差异。

Differences in children's peer sociometric and attribution ratings due to context and type of aggressive behavior.

作者信息

Willis L M, Foster S L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown 26506-6040.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1990 Apr;18(2):199-215. doi: 10.1007/BF00910731.

DOI:10.1007/BF00910731

PMID:2189923

Abstract

Sociometric and attribution (internality and responsibility) ratings of boys performing different kinds of aggression (hostile and instrumental hitting and pushing) and of neutral behavior occurring in two contexts (provoked and unprovoked) were investigated in an analogue fashion. Thirty fifth- and sixth-grade boys viewed and rated 12 brief videotaped scenes of two unfamiliar male peers interacting, presented in one of six random orders. Provoked aggression resulted in less dislike, less worthiness of punishment, and greater attribution to external causes than unprovoked aggression. Instrumental and hostile aggression produced lower liking ratings and were viewed as more deserving of punishment than neutral behavior but did not differ from each other. Results support distinctions between provoked and unprovoked aggression but not between hostile and instrumental aggression, at least in terms of their functional impact on peer judgements.

摘要

以模拟方式对男孩在两种情境（挑衅情境和非挑衅情境）下表现出的不同类型攻击行为（敌意性和工具性击打与推搡）以及中性行为进行了社会测量和归因（内控性和责任）评级。30名五、六年级男孩观看并对12个简短录像场景进行评级，这些场景展示了两个不熟悉的男性同龄人互动，以六种随机顺序之一呈现。与非挑衅性攻击相比，挑衅性攻击导致的厌恶感更少、应受惩罚性更低，且更多地归因于外部原因。工具性攻击和敌意性攻击产生的喜爱评级较低，且被认为比中性行为更应受惩罚，但二者之间没有差异。结果支持挑衅性攻击和非挑衅性攻击之间的区别，但不支持敌意性攻击和工具性攻击之间的区别，至少就它们对同伴判断的功能影响而言是这样。