Freedland Stephen J, Sutter Mark E, Dorey Frederick, Aronson William J
Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-1738, USA.
Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2):365-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02268-9.
To determine the ideal cutpoint for defining prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although various cutpoints have been used, a recent study suggested that 0.4 ng/mL may be the most appropriate.
A retrospective survey of 358 men undergoing RP at the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 1991 and 2001 was undertaken. The 3-year and 5-year risk of PSA recurrence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses using various cutpoints of postoperative PSA to define recurrence: greater than 0.1, greater than 0.2, greater than 0.3, greater than 0.4, and greater than 0.5 ng/mL. The 1 and 3-year risk of PSA progression after a detectable PSA level (PSA rising to a higher cutpoint) was evaluated for each definition of PSA recurrence using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the clinical variables that were significant independent predictors of PSA recurrence at each cutpoint.
For patients with a detectable postoperative PSA value from 0.11 to 0.2 ng/mL, the 1 and 3-year risk of PSA progression was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46% to 82%) and 93% (95% CI 74% to 99%), respectively. For patients with a PSA value from 0.21 to 0.3 ng/mL, the 1 and 3-year risk of PSA progression was 86% (95% CI 69% to 97%) and 100% (95% CI 87% to 100%), respectively. The use of higher PSA cutpoints to define recurrence resulted in a lower 5-year risk of PSA recurrence. The 5-year risk of PSA recurrence using a greater than 0.1 ng/mL cutpoint resulted in a 43% (95% CI 36% to 50%) risk of recurrence compared with only 23% (95% CI 18% to 30%) for a greater than 0.5 ng/mL cutpoint. In multivariate analysis, PSA and biopsy Gleason score were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence, regardless of the definition of PSA recurrence used (P <or=0.002).
PSA and biopsy Gleason score were significant predictors of biochemical failure, regardless of the definition of failure used. However, the definition of PSA recurrence dramatically affected the perceived success of therapy. Patients with a postoperative PSA value greater than 0.2 ng/mL are at very high risk of developing an additional rise in PSA. On the basis of this finding, a PSA value greater than 0.2 ng/mL is an appropriate cutpoint to define PSA recurrence after RP.
确定根治性前列腺切除术后(RP)定义前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)复发的理想切点。尽管已使用了各种切点,但最近一项研究表明0.4 ng/mL可能是最合适的。
对1991年至2001年间在西洛杉矶退伍军人事务医疗中心接受RP的358名男性进行回顾性调查。采用Kaplan-Meier分析,使用术后PSA的各种切点来定义复发,估计PSA复发的3年和5年风险:大于0.1、大于0.2、大于0.3、大于0.4和大于0.5 ng/mL。使用Kaplan-Meier分析,针对每个PSA复发定义,评估可检测到PSA水平(PSA升至更高切点)后PSA进展的1年和3年风险。使用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析,以确定在每个切点时PSA复发的显著独立预测临床变量。
对于术后PSA值在0.11至0.2 ng/mL之间的患者,PSA进展的1年和3年风险分别为64%(95%置信区间[CI] 46%至82%)和93%(95% CI 74%至99%)。对于PSA值在0.21至0.3 ng/mL之间的患者,PSA进展的1年和3年风险分别为86%(95% CI 69%至97%)和100%(95% CI 87%至100%)。使用更高的PSA切点来定义复发导致PSA复发的5年风险更低。使用大于0.1 ng/mL切点时PSA复发的5年风险为43%(95% CI 36%至50%),而使用大于0.5 ng/mL切点时仅为23%(95% CI 18%至30%)。在多变量分析中,无论使用何种PSA复发定义,PSA和活检Gleason评分都是生化复发的显著独立预测因素(P≤0.002)。
无论使用何种失败定义,PSA和活检Gleason评分都是生化失败的显著预测因素。然而,PSA复发的定义极大地影响了治疗的感知成功率。术后PSA值大于0.2 ng/mL的患者发生PSA进一步升高的风险非常高。基于这一发现,PSA值大于0.2 ng/mL是定义RP术后PSA复发的合适切点。