Haager Philipp K, Christott Philipp, Heussen Nicole, Lepper Wolfgang, Hanrath Peter, Hoffmann Rainer
Medical Clinic I, University Hospital RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Feb 19;41(4):532-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02870-x.
We sought to evaluate and compare recently suggested parameters of reperfusion after angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for risk stratification during long-term follow-up.
Abnormal myocardial perfusion has a detrimental impact on survival. Several parameters of reperfusion have been evaluated in controlled study populations for risk stratification.
In 253 consecutive patients undergoing intervention in AMI on a native coronary vessel, angiographic myocardial blush grade (MBG), corrected TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) frame count (CTFC) and persistent ST-segment elevation (STE) were determined to evaluate reperfusion. This was a high-risk population, including referral for treatment failure at a primary center in 29.2%, failed thrombolysis in 22.1% and cardiogenic shock in 13.4% of cases.
In addition to age, patient referral, LBBB and heart rate on admission, MBG 0 to 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.23, p < 0.001), CTFC (OR = 1.01, p = 0.015) and persistent STE >2 leads (OR = 3.46, p = 0.010) were univariate predictors of mortality during a 22.1 +/- 15.6 months follow-up. Myocardial blush grade 0 to 1 (OR = 2.17, p = 0.033) and persistent STE (OR = 3.61, p = 0.017) persisted as independent predictors of mortality, whereas CTFC failed. Differences in mortality between reperfusion groups at 30 days remained throughout the complete follow-up. In sequential Cox models, the predictive power of clinical data alone for mortality (model chi-squared 55.8) was strengthened by adding MBG (model chi-squared 64.2) and ECG postintervention (model chi-squared 69.2).
Myocardial blush grade 0 to 1 and persistent STE are independent predictors for long-term mortality after angioplasty in AMI. Corrected TIMI frame count is a less powerful predictor. Combining both parameters to consider quality of reperfusion in the myocardium at risk and extent of the infarct zone increases the predictive power.
我们试图评估并比较近期提出的急性心肌梗死(AMI)血管成形术后再灌注参数,用于长期随访期间的风险分层。
心肌灌注异常对生存有不利影响。在对照研究人群中已对多个再灌注参数进行了评估以用于风险分层。
在253例连续接受天然冠状动脉血管AMI介入治疗的患者中,测定血管造影心肌 blush 分级(MBG)、校正的 TIMI(心肌梗死溶栓)帧数(CTFC)和持续性 ST 段抬高(STE)以评估再灌注情况。这是一个高危人群,包括29.2%在一级中心因治疗失败而转诊的患者、22.1%溶栓失败的患者以及13.4%发生心源性休克的患者。
除年龄、患者转诊情况、入院时左束支传导阻滞和心率外,MBG 0至1级(比值比[OR]=3.23,p<0.001)、CTFC(OR=1.01,p=0.015)和持续性STE>2个导联(OR=3.46,p=0.010)是22.1±15.6个月随访期间死亡率的单变量预测指标。心肌 blush 分级0至1级(OR=2.17,p=0.033)和持续性STE(OR=3.61,p=0.017)仍是死亡率的独立预测指标,而CTFC则不然。再灌注组30天时的死亡率差异在整个随访期间持续存在。在序贯Cox模型中,仅临床数据对死亡率的预测能力(模型卡方值55.8)通过添加MBG(模型卡方值64.2)和干预后心电图(模型卡方值69.2)而得到增强。
心肌 blush 分级0至1级和持续性STE是AMI血管成形术后长期死亡率的独立预测指标。校正的TIMI帧数是一个预测能力较弱的指标。结合这两个参数以考虑有风险心肌的再灌注质量和梗死区域范围可提高预测能力。