Filippini Graziella, Munari Luca, Incorvaia Barbara, Ebers George C, Polman Chris, D'Amico Roberto, Rice George P A
Unità di Neuroepidemiologia, Istituto Nazionale Neurologico C Besta, Milan, Italy.
Lancet. 2003 Feb 15;361(9357):545-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12512-3.
Recombinant interferons have been approved by many national regulatory agencies for treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, but widespread discussion continues about their true effectiveness, benefits, side-effects, and costs.
With the Cochrane Collaboration methodology, we reviewed all published, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of recombinant interferons undertaken in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis between 1993 and 2002. Our primary aim was to find out whether recombinant interferons reduced the number of patients who had clinical exacerbations and disease progression, compared with placebo.
The seven trials that met our criteria included 1215 randomised patients: data from 667 (55%) were available for analysis at 1 year's and from 919 (76%) at 2 years' follow-up. Interferon seemed to reduce the number of patients who had exacerbations during the first year of treatment (relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99), but results at 2 years' follow-up were not robust and were difficult to interpret because of the many dropouts. Although the number of patients who had exacerbations (0.81, 0.74-0.89) or progressed (0.70, 0.55-0.88) during the first 2 years fell significantly in the protocol analysis, results were inconclusive after sensitivity analyses for exacerbations (1.11, 0.73-1.68) and disease progression (1.31, 0.60-2.89). Data were insufficient to establish whether steroid use and admissions to hospital were reduced in the interferon group. Similarly, MRI outcome data could not be analysed quantitatively. Side-effects were common, and acute toxic effects adversely affected quality of life.
Recombinant interferons slightly reduce the number of patients who have exacerbations during first year of treatment. Their clinical effect beyond 1 year is uncertain and new trials are needed to assess their long-term effectiveness and side-effects.
重组干扰素已获许多国家监管机构批准用于治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症,但关于其真正的疗效、益处、副作用和成本的广泛讨论仍在继续。
采用Cochrane协作网方法,我们回顾了1993年至2002年间对复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者进行的所有已发表的、随机、安慰剂对照的重组干扰素试验。我们的主要目的是确定与安慰剂相比,重组干扰素是否减少了出现临床病情加重和疾病进展的患者数量。
符合我们标准的七项试验共纳入1215例随机分组患者:667例(55%)的数据可用于1年随访分析,919例(76%)的数据可用于2年随访分析。干扰素似乎减少了治疗第一年病情加重的患者数量(相对危险度0.73,95%可信区间0.54 - 0.99),但2年随访结果并不稳定,由于许多患者退出,难以解释。尽管在方案分析中,前两年病情加重(0.81,0.74 - 0.89)或疾病进展(0.70,0.55 - 0.88)的患者数量显著下降,但在对病情加重(1.11,0.73 - 1.68)和疾病进展(1.31,0.60 - 2.89)进行敏感性分析后,结果尚无定论。数据不足以确定干扰素组是否减少了类固醇的使用和住院次数。同样,MRI结果数据无法进行定量分析。副作用很常见,急性毒性作用对生活质量有不利影响。
重组干扰素在治疗的第一年略微减少了病情加重的患者数量。其1年以上的临床效果尚不确定,需要新的试验来评估其长期疗效和副作用。