Suppr超能文献

[99mTc-Q3与201Tl在离体兔心脏不同冠状动脉血流速率下的清除和滞留特性比较]

[A comparison between 99mTc-Q3 and 201Tl on clearance and retention properties at varying coronary flow rates in isolated rabbit heart].

作者信息

Fan C, Tan T, Li Y, Kuang A, Liang Z, Chen Y

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, WCUMS, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2001 Jun;32(2):225-8, 231.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was intended to investigate and compare technetium-99m-N, N'-ethylenebis(acetylacetoneiminato)bis[tris (3-methoxy-1-propyl) phosphine] (99mTc-Q3) versus 201Tl on clearance and retention properties at varying coronary flow rates in isolated rabbit heart.

METHODS

20 New Zealand White rabbits were anaesthetized and excised through a median sternotomy. The hearts were isolated and arrested in ice-cold saline. The external perfusion models with isolated rabbit hearts were installed and were perfused at flow rates ranging from 0.52 to 3.75 ml/(g wet wt.min) in the absence of tracer recirculation. Furthermore, 99mTc-Q3 experimental relations between uptake, clearance and retention were explored in comparison with 201Tl.

RESULTS

201Tl net uptake was higher and also more affected by flow rates (P < 0.05) as compared with 99mTc-Q3 net uptake. 201Tl clearance was faster than 99mTc-Q3 clearance within 4 to 25 minutes after radiopharmaceuticals injection in high flow rates group, and 201Tl clearance was faster than 99mTc-Q3 clearance within 40 minutes after radiopharmaceuticals injection in low flow rates group. 201Tl earlier rapid clearance observed in the high flow rates group did not appear in the low flow rates group, but 99mTc-Q3 did not display early rapid clearance either in the high flow rates group or in the low flow rates group.

CONCLUSION

Owing to faster clearance, the superiority of 201Tl over 99mTc-Q3 as a myocardial perfusion imaging agent would be lost entirely within 10 minutes after injection of agent, therefore 99mTc-Q3 is still a good myocardial perfusion imaging agent, and further study is worth doing.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在研究并比较锝-99m-N,N'-亚乙基双(乙酰丙酮亚胺基)双[三(3-甲氧基-1-丙基)膦](99mTc-Q3)与铊-201在离体兔心脏不同冠状动脉血流速率下的清除和滞留特性。

方法

20只新西兰白兔麻醉后经胸骨正中切开术取出心脏。将心脏分离并置于冰冷盐水中停跳。安装离体兔心脏的体外灌注模型,在无示踪剂再循环的情况下以0.52至3.75 ml/(g湿重·分钟)的流速进行灌注。此外,与铊-201比较,探索99mTc-Q3摄取、清除和滞留之间的实验关系。

结果

与99mTc-Q3净摄取相比,铊-201净摄取更高,且受血流速率影响更大(P<0.05)。在高流速组放射性药物注射后4至25分钟内,铊-201清除比99mTc-Q3清除快,在低流速组放射性药物注射后40分钟内,铊-201清除比99mTc-Q3清除快。高流速组观察到的铊-201早期快速清除在低流速组未出现,但99mTc-Q3在高流速组和低流速组均未表现出早期快速清除。

结论

由于清除更快,铊-201作为心肌灌注显像剂相对于99mTc-Q3的优势在注射显像剂后10分钟内将完全丧失,因此99mTc-Q3仍是一种良好的心肌灌注显像剂,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验