Marshall R C, Leidholdt E M, Zhang D Y, Barnett C A
Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Martinez, Calif. 94553.
Circulation. 1990 Sep;82(3):998-1007. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.3.998.
Technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxy-2-isobutyl isonitrile (Tc-MIBI) and thallium-201 extraction, washout, and retention were investigated and compared in 20 isolated, isovolumic, retrograde blood-perfused rabbit hearts at flow rates ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 ml/g wet wt min-1 in the absence of tracer recirculation. Mean Tc-MIBI peak instantaneous extraction was lower (0.55 +/- 0.10, p less than 0.001) and more affected by flow rate (p less than 0.05) than 201Tl peak instantaneous extraction (0.83 +/- 0.06). In contrast, the rate of 201Tl washout was significantly faster (p less than 0.05) and initially more dependent on perfusion rate (p less than 0.05) than Tc-MIBI washout. Reflecting its higher peak instantaneous extraction, 201Tl retention was 55-79% higher immediately after isotope injection (p less than 0.001) than Tc-MIBI retention, and relative changes in maximal 201Tl net uptake correlated better (p less than 0.05) with relative flow changes than maximal Tc-MIBI net uptake. However, due to its faster washout rate, the superiority of thallium over Tc-MIBI as a perfusion indicator was lost within 10 minutes of tracer injection under the present single-pass experimental conditions. These data were interpreted to indicate that 1) Tc-MIBI is not as well extracted and has a slower washout rate than 201Tl; 2) varying the coronary flow rate has significant but divergent effects on the extraction, washout, and retention of Tc-MIBI and 201Tl; and 3) the present results support continued evaluation of Tc-MIBI as a possible perfusion indicator.
在20个离体、等容、逆行血液灌注的兔心脏中,研究并比较了锝-99m六甲基异丁基异腈(Tc-MIBI)和铊-201的摄取、洗脱和滞留情况,灌注速率范围为0.5至3.5 ml/g湿重·分钟-1,且不存在示踪剂再循环。与铊-201的峰值瞬时摄取(0.83±0.06)相比,Tc-MIBI的平均峰值瞬时摄取较低(0.55±0.10,p<0.001),且受灌注速率的影响更大(p<0.05)。相比之下,铊-201的洗脱速率明显更快(p<0.05),且在洗脱初期比Tc-MIBI更依赖于灌注速率(p<0.05)。由于其较高的峰值瞬时摄取,铊-201在同位素注射后立即的滞留比Tc-MIBI高55%-79%(p<0.001),并且铊-201最大净摄取的相对变化与相对流量变化的相关性比Tc-MIBI最大净摄取更好(p<0.05)。然而,由于其更快的洗脱速率,在当前的单通道实验条件下,注射示踪剂后10分钟内,铊作为灌注指标相对于Tc-MIBI的优势就消失了。这些数据被解释为表明:1)Tc-MIBI的摄取不如铊-201好,洗脱速率也比铊-201慢;2)改变冠状动脉流速对Tc-MIBI和铊-201的摄取、洗脱和滞留具有显著但不同的影响;3)目前的结果支持继续评估Tc-MIBI作为一种可能的灌注指标。