Siegmund Gunter P, Sanderson David J, Myers Barry S, Inglis J Timothy
School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Blvd, Vancouver, Canada BC V6T 1Z1.
J Biomech. 2003 Apr;36(4):473-82. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00458-x.
To examine whether habituation confounds the study of whiplash injury using human subjects, we quantified changes in the magnitude and temporal development of the neck muscle electromyogram and peak linear and angular head/torso kinematics of subjects exposed to sequential whiplash-like perturbations. Forty-four seated subjects (23F, 21M) underwent 11 consecutive forward horizontal perturbations (peak sled acceleration=1.5 g). Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded over the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and cervical paraspinal (PARA) muscles with surface electrodes, and head and torso kinematics were measured using linear and angular accelerometers and a 3D motion analysis system. EMG onset occurred at reflex latencies (67-75 ms in SCM) and did not vary with repeated perturbations. EMG amplitude was significantly attenuated by the second perturbation in PARA muscles and by the third perturbation in SCM muscles. The mean decrement in EMG amplitude between the first trial and the mean of the last five trials was between 41% and 64%. Related kinematic changes ranged from a 21% increase in head extension angle to a 29% decrease in forward acceleration at the forehead, and were also significantly different by the second exposure in some variables. Although a wider range of perturbation intensities and inter-perturbation intervals need to be studied, the significant changes observed in both muscle and kinematic variables by the second perturbation indicated that habituation was a potential confounder of whiplash injury studies using repeated perturbations of human subjects.
为了研究习惯化是否会干扰使用人体受试者进行的鞭打损伤研究,我们对暴露于连续鞭打样扰动的受试者的颈部肌肉肌电图的幅度和时间发展变化,以及头部/躯干的线性和角向运动学峰值进行了量化。44名坐位受试者(23名女性,21名男性)接受了11次连续的向前水平扰动(雪橇峰值加速度 = 1.5g)。使用表面电极记录胸锁乳突肌(SCM)和颈部椎旁肌(PARA)的肌电活动,并使用线性和角向加速度计以及三维运动分析系统测量头部和躯干的运动学数据。肌电起始发生在反射潜伏期(SCM中为67 - 75毫秒),并且不随重复扰动而变化。PARA肌肉的第二次扰动和SCM肌肉的第三次扰动使肌电幅度显著衰减。第一次试验与最后五次试验平均值之间的肌电幅度平均下降幅度在41%至64%之间。相关的运动学变化范围从头部伸展角度增加21%到前额向前加速度下降29%,并且在某些变量中,第二次暴露时也有显著差异。尽管需要研究更广泛的扰动强度和扰动间隔,但第二次扰动时在肌肉和运动学变量中观察到的显著变化表明,习惯化是使用人体受试者重复扰动进行鞭打损伤研究的一个潜在混杂因素。